<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Nofollow revisited</title> <atom:link href="http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/</link> <description>Protect yourself from government gaffes, bureaucratic blunders and incumbent incompetence</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:55:04 -0400</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Messages in a bottle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Honeypots: better than CAPTCHAs?</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-59403</link> <dc:creator>Messages in a bottle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Honeypots: better than CAPTCHAs?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:10:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-59403</guid> <description>[...] You can use rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; in an attempt to discourage them, but Michael Hampton has argued in a spirited essay on rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; that in fact nofollow doesn&#8217;t discourage spammers. By now that claim is [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can use rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; in an attempt to discourage them, but Michael Hampton has argued in a spirited essay on rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; that in fact nofollow doesn&#8217;t discourage spammers. By now that claim is [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DayLightCoffee.Com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Wants You to Snitch on Your Competition in 3 Easy Steps</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-50369</link> <dc:creator>DayLightCoffee.Com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Wants You to Snitch on Your Competition in 3 Easy Steps</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 03:35:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-50369</guid> <description>[...] I find their first solution rather suspicious as the rel=”nofollow” attribute was originally created to help deter comment spam. But, I’m beginning to think Michael Hampton (along with many others) was right when he said that, essentially, Google was having bloggers and webmasters help them clean up their index (i.e. doing their job for them). [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I find their first solution rather suspicious as the rel=”nofollow” attribute was originally created to help deter comment spam. But, I’m beginning to think Michael Hampton (along with many others) was right when he said that, essentially, Google was having bloggers and webmasters help them clean up their index (i.e. doing their job for them). [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark&#8217;s (we)Blog &#187; Spreading some link love</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-50166</link> <dc:creator>Mark&#8217;s (we)Blog &#187; Spreading some link love</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:33:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-50166</guid> <description>[...] rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; attribute on HTML anchors was supposed to help prevent comment spam. Unfortunately, as Michael Hampton explains at length, NoFollow hasn&#8217;t worked - at least not based on the volume of comment spam that Akismet has removed since I moved to [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; attribute on HTML anchors was supposed to help prevent comment spam. Unfortunately, as Michael Hampton explains at length, NoFollow hasn&#8217;t worked &#8211; at least not based on the volume of comment spam that Akismet has removed since I moved to [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Info4BeingRich</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-48800</link> <dc:creator>Info4BeingRich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 04:43:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-48800</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;How To Remove Nofollow Tag And Make Your Blog A Do...&lt;/strong&gt;Homelandstupidity suggests this idea for wordpress users:Bad Behavior Blackhole is a DNS-based blackhole list which lists sources of comment spam and open proxy servers. Bad Behavior Blackhole intends to have the most complete list of open proxie.....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How To Remove Nofollow Tag And Make Your Blog A Do&#8230;</strong></p><p>Homelandstupidity suggests this idea for wordpress users:</p><p>Bad Behavior Blackhole is a DNS-based blackhole list which lists sources of comment spam and open proxy servers. Bad Behavior Blackhole intends to have the most complete list of open proxie&#8230;..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Google Wants You to Snitch on Your Competition in 3 Easy Steps - WordPress SEO and Blog Marketing</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-47875</link> <dc:creator>Google Wants You to Snitch on Your Competition in 3 Easy Steps - WordPress SEO and Blog Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 03:04:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-47875</guid> <description>[...] I find their first solution rather suspicious as the rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; attribute was originally created to help deter comment spam. But, I&#8217;m beginning to think&#160;Michael Hampton&#160;(along with many others) was right when he said that, essentially, Google was having bloggers and webmasters help them clean up their index (i.e. doing their job for them). [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I find their first solution rather suspicious as the rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; attribute was originally created to help deter comment spam. But, I&rsquo;m beginning to think&nbsp;Michael Hampton&nbsp;(along with many others) was right when he said that, essentially, Google was having bloggers and webmasters help them clean up their index (i.e. doing their job for them). [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Net Writing &#187; Is No Follow tag for Comments a good idea?</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-44016</link> <dc:creator>Net Writing &#187; Is No Follow tag for Comments a good idea?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 18:45:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-44016</guid> <description>[...] No Follow Revisited - many resources about the history of no follow [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No Follow Revisited &#8211; many resources about the history of no follow [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chasing a Dream is a Do Follow Blog</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-43560</link> <dc:creator>Chasing a Dream is a Do Follow Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 01:42:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-43560</guid> <description>[...] Some of you are wondering, &#8220;What&#8217;s the big deal&#8221;? If it&#8217;s built-in to WordPress by default, it&#8217;s got to be right. That&#8217;s a matter of opinion. Google introduced the concept of using an attribute rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on links in 2005, to theoretically help reduce comment spam, and create more accurate Page Rank. However, many disagree that it has had much influence on comment spam, and we feel people should get link credit for posting comments. If you would like more information on the controversy, you can check Michael Hampton&#8217;s Masy 2005 post, Nofollow Revisited. It covers the story well, from the intent, how it is supposed to work, and why it doesn&#8217;t work. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some of you are wondering, &#8220;What&#8217;s the big deal&#8221;? If it&#8217;s built-in to WordPress by default, it&#8217;s got to be right. That&#8217;s a matter of opinion. Google introduced the concept of using an attribute rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; on links in 2005, to theoretically help reduce comment spam, and create more accurate Page Rank. However, many disagree that it has had much influence on comment spam, and we feel people should get link credit for posting comments. If you would like more information on the controversy, you can check Michael Hampton&#8217;s Masy 2005 post, Nofollow Revisited. It covers the story well, from the intent, how it is supposed to work, and why it doesn&#8217;t work. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WordPress PHP Programming &#187; Google-Approved Links</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-41475</link> <dc:creator>WordPress PHP Programming &#187; Google-Approved Links</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:58:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-41475</guid> <description>[...] First, there was the nofollow business, detailed shortly after its introduction in this article which still holds true today. The nofollow attribute applied a link would instruct a search engine spider to (largely, but not entirely) ignore the linked page and its content. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First, there was the nofollow business, detailed shortly after its introduction in this article which still holds true today. The nofollow attribute applied a link would instruct a search engine spider to (largely, but not entirely) ignore the linked page and its content. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: I love comments .. I hate Spam &#124; Ugh!!&#8217;s Greymatter Honeypot</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-38949</link> <dc:creator>I love comments .. I hate Spam &#124; Ugh!!&#8217;s Greymatter Honeypot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 10:03:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-38949</guid> <description>[...] DoFollow is a plugin that removes the evil NoFollow from WordPress&#8216; comments. Sometime back, this tag had been introduced by search engines to try and minimise comment spam but the truth is .. well it hasn&#8217;t. This plugin makes sure that people who comment get a link back to their site, both for people to click on and follow, and also for search engines to index. I would recommend this to anyone who encourages commenting on their blog. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DoFollow is a plugin that removes the evil NoFollow from WordPress&#8216; comments. Sometime back, this tag had been introduced by search engines to try and minimise comment spam but the truth is .. well it hasn&#8217;t. This plugin makes sure that people who comment get a link back to their site, both for people to click on and follow, and also for search engines to index. I would recommend this to anyone who encourages commenting on their blog. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: anti-SPAM &#124; The Definitive Article on Why &#8220;nofollow&#8221; Doesn&#8217;t Work &#124; IT Infusion &#124; Calgary, Alberta</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-32583</link> <dc:creator>anti-SPAM &#124; The Definitive Article on Why &#8220;nofollow&#8221; Doesn&#8217;t Work &#124; IT Infusion &#124; Calgary, Alberta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:23:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-32583</guid> <description>[...] I just stumbled upon what is probably the definitive article on the &#8220;nofollow&#8221; controversy.Â  I won&#8217;t try to summarize, but I really do suggest you give it a read. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I just stumbled upon what is probably the definitive article on the &#8220;nofollow&#8221; controversy.Â  I won&#8217;t try to summarize, but I really do suggest you give it a read. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Plastic Man</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-21511</link> <dc:creator>Plastic Man</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:30:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-21511</guid> <description>It seems to me that &quot;rel=nofollow&quot; doesn&#039;t work in yahoo. With this method: link:http://mypage.com i can also see the referrals with nofollow.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that &#8220;rel=nofollow&#8221; doesn&#8217;t work in yahoo. With this method: link:http://mypage.com i can also see the referrals with nofollow.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Leezig</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-19353</link> <dc:creator>Leezig</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:18:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-19353</guid> <description>I for one will certainly not be using nofollow when I eventually get my blog up and running, and although I won&#039;t be manually adding comments I will be moderating very closely...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one will certainly not be using nofollow when I eventually get my blog up and running, and although I won&#8217;t be manually adding comments I will be moderating very closely&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James Grimes</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-18095</link> <dc:creator>James Grimes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:51:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-18095</guid> <description>rel no follow doesnt seem to get rid of spam, you need to mderate comments to to that!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rel no follow doesnt seem to get rid of spam, you need to mderate comments to to that!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott at RealEpicure</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-16459</link> <dc:creator>Scott at RealEpicure</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:59:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-16459</guid> <description>I wonder sometimes if nofollow works with all search engines.It&#039;s a possibility some don&#039;t take note of this tag, since they don&#039;t all conform in the same way that Google does.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder sometimes if nofollow works with all search engines.</p><p>It&#8217;s a possibility some don&#8217;t take note of this tag, since they don&#8217;t all conform in the same way that Google does.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tech Guy</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-14966</link> <dc:creator>Tech Guy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 21:55:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/05/23/nofollow-revisited/#comment-14966</guid> <description>I can&#039;t believe that no part of this post has Akismet listed.Akismet is an essential plugin for preventing comment spam on Wordpress.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe that no part of this post has Akismet listed.</p><p>Akismet is an essential plugin for preventing comment spam on Wordpress.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/19 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.homelandstupidity.us

Served from: www.homelandstupidity.us @ 2010-03-20 00:19:53 -->