<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court rules on medical marijuana</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/</link>
	<description>Protect yourself from government gaffes, bureaucratic blunders and incumbent incompetence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supreme Court expands eminent domain - Homeland Stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Supreme Court expands eminent domain - Homeland Stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 22:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>[...] This isn&#8217;t the first bad decision to come out of the Supreme Court this month. In Raich v. Ashcroft the Court ruled that growing marijuana in your back yard for your own personal consumption qualifies as interstate commerce and therefore falls under the jurisdiction of Congress, even when the marijuana never crossed state lines, and never was bought or sold. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This isn&#8217;t the first bad decision to come out of the Supreme Court this month. In Raich v. Ashcroft the Court ruled that growing marijuana in your back yard for your own personal consumption qualifies as interstate commerce and therefore falls under the jurisdiction of Congress, even when the marijuana never crossed state lines, and never was bought or sold. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stare Decisis - Homeland Security or Homeland Stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Stare Decisis - Homeland Security or Homeland Stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>[...] Two well-known examples of Supreme Court mistakes from the last year include the Kelo v. New London eminent domain case and the Raich v. Gonzales medical marijuana case. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Two well-known examples of Supreme Court mistakes from the last year include the Kelo v. New London eminent domain case and the Raich v. Gonzales medical marijuana case. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Losing the Constitution - Homeland Security or Homeland Stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Losing the Constitution - Homeland Security or Homeland Stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 05:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>[...] My second example concerns federalism. Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in a famous opinion that federalism fosters &#8220;laboratories of democracy,&#8221; where policies can be tried in individual states and their good or poor results noted elsewhere. The growth of federal power has shuttered many of those laboratories. A federal government that can ban the personal use of medical marijuana grown right in your own backyard &#8212; which is plainly neither &#8220;interstate&#8221; nor &#8220;commerce,&#8221; yet was easily upheld by the Supreme Court last term &#8212; can do just about anything to blot out local policy choices. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My second example concerns federalism. Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in a famous opinion that federalism fosters &#8220;laboratories of democracy,&#8221; where policies can be tried in individual states and their good or poor results noted elsewhere. The growth of federal power has shuttered many of those laboratories. A federal government that can ban the personal use of medical marijuana grown right in your own backyard &#8212; which is plainly neither &#8220;interstate&#8221; nor &#8220;commerce,&#8221; yet was easily upheld by the Supreme Court last term &#8212; can do just about anything to blot out local policy choices. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marijuana persecutions reach all-time high - IO ERROR</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>Marijuana persecutions reach all-time high - IO ERROR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>[...] In June, the Supreme Court screwed up by ruling that growing marijuana for personal consumption qualified as interstate commerce. Needless to say, the crackdowns began in earnest shortly thereafter. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In June, the Supreme Court screwed up by ruling that growing marijuana for personal consumption qualified as interstate commerce. Needless to say, the crackdowns began in earnest shortly thereafter. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IO ERROR</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/#comment-1047</link>
		<dc:creator>IO ERROR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 04:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/#comment-1047</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;DEA begins marijuana crackdown in California&lt;/strong&gt;

	The Drug Enforcement Administration yesterday executed search warrants on three medical marijuana dispensaries, and 20 other residences, businesses and growing sites, leading to multiple arrests.
	We will not turn a blind eye to serious and flagrant d...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DEA begins marijuana crackdown in California</strong></p>
<p>	The Drug Enforcement Administration yesterday executed search warrants on three medical marijuana dispensaries, and 20 other residences, businesses and growing sites, leading to multiple arrests.<br />
	We will not turn a blind eye to serious and flagrant d&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IO ERROR &#187; Supreme Court expands eminent domain</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>IO ERROR &#187; Supreme Court expands eminent domain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>[...] y reason and your land turned over to anybody for any purpose. 	This isn&#8217;t the first bad decision to come out of the Supreme Court this month. In Raich v.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] y reason and your land turned over to anybody for any purpose. 	This isn&#8217;t the first bad decision to come out of the Supreme Court this month. In Raich v.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomas De Aquino</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas De Aquino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 04:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/06/07/supreme-court-rules-on-medical-marijuana/#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>I want some. I hate politics. Really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want some. I hate politics. Really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.071 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 13:39:40 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
