<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which is more secure, Windows or Linux?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/07/13/which-is-more-secure-windows-or-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/07/13/which-is-more-secure-windows-or-linux/</link>
	<description>Protect yourself from government gaffes, bureaucratic blunders and incumbent incompetence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/07/13/which-is-more-secure-windows-or-linux/#comment-1459</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 22:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/?p=238#comment-1459</guid>
		<description>Clearly Linux is the most secure.  And even if Microsoft is now going to pay more attention to security and stability, I&#039;ll believe it when I see it.  Even if Windows were more secure, it&#039;s still the one that&#039;s targeted the most.

As I said on another thread, however, Linux out of the box is not all that secure, simply because most of the security software is not installed and configured by default.  Its for this reason that I would have problems advising an unsophisticated Windows user to switch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly Linux is the most secure.  And even if Microsoft is now going to pay more attention to security and stability, I&#8217;ll believe it when I see it.  Even if Windows were more secure, it&#8217;s still the one that&#8217;s targeted the most.</p>
<p>As I said on another thread, however, Linux out of the box is not all that secure, simply because most of the security software is not installed and configured by default.  Its for this reason that I would have problems advising an unsophisticated Windows user to switch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Deaton</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/07/13/which-is-more-secure-windows-or-linux/#comment-1458</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Deaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 05:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/?p=238#comment-1458</guid>
		<description>Well, if you take a look out of the box, it is obvious which is more insecure for the idiots who dont pay attention. Which operating system lets you set a null administrator password? Which operating system comes with a null administrator password out of the box? Which system doesn&#039;t alert you if you put in a weak password? I think its all pretty obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you take a look out of the box, it is obvious which is more insecure for the idiots who dont pay attention. Which operating system lets you set a null administrator password? Which operating system comes with a null administrator password out of the box? Which system doesn&#8217;t alert you if you put in a weak password? I think its all pretty obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.059 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 12:38:06 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
