Secure Flight should be grounded for Privacy Act violations

Last month I told you about Secure Flight, the successor program to CAPPS II being implemented by the Transporation Security Administration for airline passenger screening. I also told you that the program violated the federal Privacy Act of 1974. This month, a Government Accountability Office report proves it (PDF).

The TSA collected over 100 million records on members of the public from commercial data providers for the Secure Flight program without disclosing the data collection or usage in its Privacy Act notices. Once it was caught, the agency then attempted to retroactively change the notices.

But TSA’s deception and privacy-invasive practices don’t stop there. According to an AP story, the TSA plans to test whether commercial data could help find terrorist “sleeper cells.” “We are trying to use commercial data to verify the identities of people who fly because we are not going to rely on the watch list,” said Justin Oberman, who’s in charge of Secure Flight. “If we just rise and fall on the watch list, it’s not adequate.” — Electronic Frontier Foundation

Bruce Schneier, author of Beyond Fear, who is on a working group overseeing Secure Flight, commented, “Secure Flight is a disaster in every way. The TSA has been operating with complete disregard for the law or Congress. It has lied to pretty much everyone. And it is turning Secure Flight from a simple program to match airline passengers against terrorist watch lists into a complex program that compiles dossiers on passengers in order to give them some kind of score indicating the likelihood that they are a terrorist.”

Unfortunately, unlike CAPPS II, we can’t just have them not go forward with the program. The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 requires the TSA to implement a passenger screening program. The best we can do, aside from repealing the act, is to ensure that the program doesn’t go out of control before it even gets off the ground.

One thought on “Secure Flight should be grounded for Privacy Act violations

  • May 22, 2006 at 7:59 pm
    Permalink

    Victim of On Line Deception / Ripped-Off By TSA/FAA

    Good-Day,
    I am contacting you in regards to what can be proven as an On-line deception, leading to the acquisition of equipment and merchandise from unsuspecting air travelers by the T.S.A./F.A.A. , possessions some of which have become great value losses, justified by an assumption, and dismissed as justified as too great to account for. In this day and age there is simply no excuse for the non-accountability of high dollar valued items.
    Most air travelers seeking conductive on-line research regarding information on prohibited items do not have the convenience of a Single information source, or search engine to rely upon, items recommended as not being allowed are fragmented into multiple web and information sites.
    An air traveler must have the knowledge and time to locate the additional information that is not prevalent.
    I have debated and proven my point in regards to this issue with representatives that for the most part did(past tense)support the decision of the T.S.A.. On the following web site:
    http://www.ripoffreport.com/security-services/tsa/tsa-transportation-security-ad-abb48.htm
    The working class of people that don’t have a lot of time and possessions to lose from what only can be compared as organized crime/mafia/TSA, will appreciate the fact that the T.S.A. should not be beyond accountability of the passengers that depend upon it.
    Sincerely Robert A. Valdez, Former 91.14 RADAR FMR.

Comments are closed.