<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista Beta 1 review and screenshots part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/</link>
	<description>Protect yourself from government gaffes, bureaucratic blunders and incumbent incompetence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evgen Panov</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator>Evgen Panov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1783</guid>
		<description>I downgraded from RTM to Beta 1 and I love the switch.
Beta 1 looked so much better than this ugly RTM.

The shell for every window was amazing. Loved the green, orange and blue.

Performance is better than one of RTM, games run faster.
Installed like a charm on a 2nd HD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downgraded from RTM to Beta 1 and I love the switch.<br />
Beta 1 looked so much better than this ugly RTM.</p>
<p>The shell for every window was amazing. Loved the green, orange and blue.</p>
<p>Performance is better than one of RTM, games run faster.<br />
Installed like a charm on a 2nd HD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1782</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1782</guid>
		<description>!!!!!!!!! UPDATE WINDOWS VISTA IS SOFA KING GHAY.....
NOTHING FOLLOWS&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>!!!!!!!!! UPDATE WINDOWS VISTA IS SOFA KING GHAY&#8230;..<br />
NOTHING FOLLOWS&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>using windows vista ..when i click on a e-mail link in a
web page
it opens 45 explorer windows and gives an error message

default mail is out look
web browser is ie 7

im not sure if it a problem w/ vista ,outlook or ie 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>using windows vista ..when i click on a e-mail link in a<br />
web page<br />
it opens 45 explorer windows and gives an error message</p>
<p>default mail is out look<br />
web browser is ie 7</p>
<p>im not sure if it a problem w/ vista ,outlook or ie 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KILLARMY</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator>KILLARMY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1780</guid>
		<description>I installed Windows Vista beta 1, but i cannot login, he ask me Username and Password.. and i dont know that username and password.. whre can that??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed Windows Vista beta 1, but i cannot login, he ask me Username and Password.. and i dont know that username and password.. whre can that??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffc</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1779</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1779</guid>
		<description>If any of you are having problems with Vista logon to NAS devices running Samba, try:

Run secpol.msc

Go to: Local Policies &gt; Security Options


Find &quot;Network Security: LAN Manager authentication level&quot;

Change Setting from &quot;Send NTLMv2 response only&quot;
to
&quot;Send LM &amp; NTLM - use NTLMv2 session security if negotiated&quot;

Vista defaults to only send the more secure NTLMv2 protocol, which these NAS devices / Samba do not support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If any of you are having problems with Vista logon to NAS devices running Samba, try:</p>
<p>Run secpol.msc</p>
<p>Go to: Local Policies &gt; Security Options</p>
<p>Find &#8220;Network Security: LAN Manager authentication level&#8221;</p>
<p>Change Setting from &#8220;Send NTLMv2 response only&#8221;<br />
to<br />
&#8220;Send LM &amp; NTLM &#8211; use NTLMv2 session security if negotiated&#8221;</p>
<p>Vista defaults to only send the more secure NTLMv2 protocol, which these NAS devices / Samba do not support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darlyn Perez</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator>Darlyn Perez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 00:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1778</guid>
		<description>This review is the best one I&#039;ve seen so far. That&#039;s exceptionally good, considering the tons of reviews I&#039;ve read about Vista. Very informative and sticks to the point. The screen shots also help out big time.

Anyway, my opinion on Mrugesh&#039;s above comment (second post above this one):
Thanks for dawning the reality of Vista into words: It&#039;s just added eye-candy and really nothing majorly new. The new Desktop Widgets, which were obviously copied from the Mac, don&#039;t really add much to the usability of Windows. And come to think of it, all Windows does really &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; teach you to point and click, unless you&#039;re a geek like me and decide to toy (and hack) with all of the internal components regular users never know exist (things that are mostly in the system32 folder).

Please do not take this as my opposition to Windows; I am a huge hardcore fan and user of Windows and have always(and will most likely for ever)used it. I have even refitted my Windows XP to look exactly like Vista, ranging from the Log-on screen to the user interface. Kudos again on the review, Michael Hampton and thanks for inspiring me to try Linux one day, Mrugesh.

&lt;b&gt;-Darlyn Perez&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This review is the best one I&#8217;ve seen so far. That&#8217;s exceptionally good, considering the tons of reviews I&#8217;ve read about Vista. Very informative and sticks to the point. The screen shots also help out big time.</p>
<p>Anyway, my opinion on Mrugesh&#8217;s above comment (second post above this one):<br />
Thanks for dawning the reality of Vista into words: It&#8217;s just added eye-candy and really nothing majorly new. The new Desktop Widgets, which were obviously copied from the Mac, don&#8217;t really add much to the usability of Windows. And come to think of it, all Windows does really <i>is</i> teach you to point and click, unless you&#8217;re a geek like me and decide to toy (and hack) with all of the internal components regular users never know exist (things that are mostly in the system32 folder).</p>
<p>Please do not take this as my opposition to Windows; I am a huge hardcore fan and user of Windows and have always(and will most likely for ever)used it. I have even refitted my Windows XP to look exactly like Vista, ranging from the Log-on screen to the user interface. Kudos again on the review, Michael Hampton and thanks for inspiring me to try Linux one day, Mrugesh.</p>
<p><b>-Darlyn Perez</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikie2006</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1777</link>
		<dc:creator>nikie2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1777</guid>
		<description>i need an antivirus program for microsoft vista beta 1. norton isn&#039;t working</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i need an antivirus program for microsoft vista beta 1. norton isn&#8217;t working</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 04:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1776</guid>
		<description>get BSD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>get BSD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrugesh</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrugesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Windows my whole life. I was pretty excited about Windows XP. Then I switched to Linux. For the past year, I haven&#039;t touched Windows except to play Pro Evolution Soccer! I don&#039;t mean to be partial here, just because I prefer Linux over Windows. But, looking at this review and the screenshots etc, I see more of the same with added eye-candy.

Now, I&#039;ve become a hard-core geek. I can honestly see Microsoft trying to emulate Unix/Linux. The only difference being, all these great features are available to me on the CLI (though KDE/Gnome do make a good job of providing very fine GUI&#039;s to most of the stuff, along with other apps of course!). The Windows way is with pretty graphical interfaces.

I wouldn&#039;t want to make unhealthy comments like SiMpSoN before me has done, but honestly, I don&#039;t think I would want to spend my money on Vista...

Something I really believe in... Linux teaches you actually use your computer.. Windows teaches you to point and click!

But, like I said, I don&#039;t want to be partial. Vista does look very nice. (I&#039;m talking about the graphical interface!) Apart from the looks, atleast in this beta release, I don&#039;t see anything really new or special. Though for people who only care about the eye candy and &quot;ease of use&quot; Vista does look good. For us geeks, we have Linux ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Windows my whole life. I was pretty excited about Windows XP. Then I switched to Linux. For the past year, I haven&#8217;t touched Windows except to play Pro Evolution Soccer! I don&#8217;t mean to be partial here, just because I prefer Linux over Windows. But, looking at this review and the screenshots etc, I see more of the same with added eye-candy.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;ve become a hard-core geek. I can honestly see Microsoft trying to emulate Unix/Linux. The only difference being, all these great features are available to me on the CLI (though KDE/Gnome do make a good job of providing very fine GUI&#8217;s to most of the stuff, along with other apps of course!). The Windows way is with pretty graphical interfaces.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t want to make unhealthy comments like SiMpSoN before me has done, but honestly, I don&#8217;t think I would want to spend my money on Vista&#8230;</p>
<p>Something I really believe in&#8230; Linux teaches you actually use your computer.. Windows teaches you to point and click!</p>
<p>But, like I said, I don&#8217;t want to be partial. Vista does look very nice. (I&#8217;m talking about the graphical interface!) Apart from the looks, atleast in this beta release, I don&#8217;t see anything really new or special. Though for people who only care about the eye candy and &#8220;ease of use&#8221; Vista does look good. For us geeks, we have Linux <img src='http://www.homelandstupidity.us/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiMp5oN - MACEDONIA</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>SiMp5oN - MACEDONIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2005/08/02/1-windows-vista-beta-1-review-and-screenshots/#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>WINDOWS VISTA SUCK`S!!! It`s new XP release with SP 3!!!
LINUX RULZ!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WINDOWS VISTA SUCK`S!!! It`s new XP release with SP 3!!!<br />
LINUX RULZ!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.099 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-08 18:33:10 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
