Comments on: Unanswered questions in Jean Charles de Menezes shooting

By: Clif

Clif — Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:08:43 +0000

This case has ‘ hinged’ on the assumtion of mistaken identity…given the evidence of what the Police said and what witness’s saw..people are foooled, it was not mistaken idenity the Police got exactly the person they intended to get. All the rest is smoke and mirrors’ the question now is why?? what made this chap such a danger to British Intelligence..did he know more about the electrics, the tube train bombs, where witnss’s said the floor of the carriage was blown upward… from below… and no footgage of said bombers entering or near the train exiasts.
Its a Dark world as Dr Kelly might say.

By: N Chalmers

N Chalmers — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:47:06 +0000

It is glaringly obvious that the Menezes killing was fishy, as was the Stephen Kelly assassination. I wish people would wake up and work things out for themselves, and not believe the rubbish in the media. It is obvious that the new world order globalists are furthering their agenda daily I wish people would wake up and see it.

By: Mark Rosmar

Mark Rosmar — Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:24:48 +0000

The thing that gets me about the whole Jean Charles de Menezes incident is that whenever the position of the Met is publicly represented it is always by authority, officialdom and eloquence contrasted with the position of the Brazilian which is normally portrayed by an accented, mis-focussed individual. But what cost my faith in The Met is the lies and spin that came from them via the media, not to mention how they toyed with the timelines, lost the CCTV, bamoozled the press, distorted information, misdirected the information flow, promoted the Commander, demonized the young man,lied to the public with innuendo as well as the IPCC investigation and then to suggest that they were not offering the poor boy’s family (the paltry) £500,000. If it were an American citizen who was shot I think it might have turned out somewhat differently, and actually it the rush to appease the American masters in the first place that put the Met in this position (intentionally or unintentionally); incidentally the positon of the Met: a tragic error while trying to protect Londoners from terrorism and trying to apprehend the 21/7 misbombers has been accepted without ever being proven or challenged. Look, no matter what is said now, the boy is dead, he cannot rise, no choric “sorry” is going to bring him back, but if I were the judge on this one the award I would make against the Met -to the De Menezes family would be enough to build a new Heathrow Airport.

By: Justin Case

Justin Case — Sat, 12 May 2007 21:17:21 +0000

The assasination of De Menezes was a carefully planed exercise designed to have the maximum news impact arround the world. It was a loud and clear message to anyone who was thinking of whistleblowing about what really happened on 7/7. The message said: Look, this is what we can do to anyone, any time, any place, with total impunity. Peter Power, managing director of Visor Consultants (and a former Scotland Yard official) contacted, and was interviewed on national radio and television on 7/7 to exoplain that his company had been involved in a mock terrorist attack exercise involving the same tube stations which were attacked, and at the same the same time that the bombings took place(these interviews are redilly available on-the net). His decision to go on air must certainly have compromised his company’s relationship with his contractor’s (whose name he is careful not to mention) by bringing this “bizzare coincidence” to the attention of the media. Yet he went out of his way to tell his story. Why did he do that if not to protect himself by raising his profile? And would he have even tried to get in touch with the media the day after De Menezes was executed?

By: Leila Mendonca

Leila Mendonca — Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:19:40 +0000

I’m Brazilian, writing a script about Jean Charles de Menezes’ death.

I found it deeply disgusting that a reader of this site has suggested that Maria and Matusinhos, Jean’s parents, know about a HOAX, that their son body is not buried at Gonzaga cemetery and so on. I visited Gonzaga myself, I taped the mass realized by the time of what was to be his 28th birthday, we made a homage in the cemetery, I became friends with his parents, brother, family and whole city and I’m asking people here that, whatever theory your mind make up, do please don’t offend their family and don’t doubt that Jean was innocent. People paranoic as Illuminati fans like to say that because Jean was an eletricist, he knew something about bombs or have some links with it. Those people are ignorant. Jean got an eletrician certificate through a popular learning distant course in Brazil and in London he fixed alarms and unsophisticated eletric things (as my own brother do in Brazil too). We Brazilian are far away from the ways terrorists and lordwars carry their killing business. Since I have started read everything about Stockwell case (in order to enrich my script) I haven’t read anything more absurd than what I read in this site: one saying that jean is not dead, that his coffin is empty, and so on…. Those people are of the same type of the ones who like to think Elvis is alive or Kennedy lives in Nepal…. They wouldn’t tell such things if they could hold the hands of Jean’s mother as I did and share with her the pain of loosing a son in such criminal circunstances (no matter if the state wins the case, it won’t make the execution less criminal).

Anyone who would like to give me his opinion – not hate mail, please – can contact me at scriptandfilm@yahoo.com

Thanks

By: who

who — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:39:41 +0000

The first article is

http://journalspace.com/wp-signup.php?new=who

and the second is

http://journalspace.com/wp-signup.php?new=who

and it links to the photos referred to in the first post earlier that day.

Consider also the absence of CCTV footage of De Menezes at the station.

He was not there, there is nothing to show! It is not that the cameras were accidentally switched off or were wiped in a cover-up attempt. It is all a HOAX and the parents know it. They continue to support the smoke screen, now making irrelevant complaints that top policeman Ian Blair misled the public for a few days.

Look at the images.

By: Michael Hampton

Michael Hampton — Sat, 26 Nov 2005 18:48:09 +0000

And would you care to explain that or supply some evidence? There is nothing at your Web site which can remotely be called “evidence” of this ridiculous claim.

By: who

who — Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:38:16 +0000

It did not happen! Jean Charles was not on that train.

It was a cruel and sophisticated hoax to frighten the public and bombers who are not up for suicide.

By: Sarah Maiorino

Sarah Maiorino — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 04:13:57 +0000

I can not belive that Menezes was shot, killed…and for what? I am currently doing an assignment on this issue at school and i have found that the Police had no accurate evidence to support Menezes being a terrorist. There was a lack of communication between the different branches of the police (Menezes was told to be ‘taken alive’) and the Police’s story about Menezes jumping ticket barriers and running from them, is now believed to be untrue. It discusts me at how paranoid our society now is. I am 15 years old and even i can see that what we are doing is wrong. Ever since September 11th our society has been filled with hatred and paranoia. When is it all going to end? Well, i thought that killing an innocent person out of descreation and haste would make us all realise that we all need to stop and have a think about what we are doing to each other. We live in fear. Menezes was a Brazillian electrician who had no ties what so ever to terrorism. If is can happen to him, it could happen to any of us. When are we going to learn that violence does not solve our problems?

By: Andrew Milner

Andrew Milner — Sat, 20 Aug 2005 09:49:16 +0000

If the Metropolitan Police would fabricate just about every detail of the Stockwell shooting, you can’t help wondering if the 7 July bombing was kosher (no pun intended).
Face it, the Vietnam War was lost on the home front, so what more logical way to keep the Brits. on side than a terrorist outrage in London. Risky strategy, because in backfired in Madrid. But this time Tricky Tony has the media under tight control. Bush is in serious trouble, and not just in Iraq. Time’s running out and he’s getting desperate. Expect something big very soon. Nice neutral Buddhist country, anyone?