Last week at an intelligence conference in San Antonio, Texas, Mary Margaret Graham, deputy director of national intelligence for collection, said — in public — that the national intelligence budget was $44 billion. The revelation appears to be a mistake.

The number was reported Monday in U.S. News & World Report, whose national security reporter, Kevin Whitelaw, was among the hundreds of people attending Graham’s talk.

“I thought, ‘I can’t believe she said that,’” Whitelaw said on Monday. “The government has spent so much time and energy arguing that it needs to remain classified.”

The figure itself comes as no great shock; most news reports in the last couple of years have estimated the budget at $40 billion. But the fact that Graham would say it in public is a surprise because the government has repeatedly gone to court to keep the current intelligence budget and even past budgets as far back as the 1940s from being disclosed.

Carl Kropf, a spokesman for the office of the director of national intelligence, John Negroponte, said Graham would not comment. Kropf declined to say whether the figure was accurate, or whether her revelation was accidental.

Graham mentioned the number Oct. 31 at an annual conference on intelligence gathered from satellite and other photographs.

Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, expressed amused satisfaction that the figure had slipped out.

“It is ironic,” Aftergood said. “We sued the CIA four times for this kind of information and lost. You can’t get it through legal channels.”

Only for a few past years has the budget been disclosed. After Aftergood’s group first sued for the figure under the Freedom of Information Act in 1997, George Tenet, then the CIA director, decided to make public that year’s budget, $26.6 billion. The next year Tenet did the same, revealing that the 1998 fiscal year budget was $26.7 billion.

But in 1999, Tenet reversed that policy, and budgets since then have remained classified with the support of the courts. Last year, a federal judge refused to order the CIA to release its budgets for 1947 to 1970 — except for the 1963 budget, which Aftergood showed had already been revealed elsewhere.

In court and in response to inquiries, intelligence officials have argued that disclosing the spying budget would create pressure to reveal more spending details, and that such revelations could aid the nation’s adversaries.

That argument has been rejected by many members of Congress and outside experts, who note that most of the Defense Department budget is published in exhaustive detail without evident harm. — New York Times

Indeed. There’s very little that our enemies can do with the amount of money spent on intelligence services. Especially since that money seems to buy so little intelligence.

What it would do is allow Congress to investigate and see where the intelligence community is wasting money and clean house, and of course, none of them want outsiders cleaning house.