Homeland Security management sucks

December 28, 2005 @ 5 Comments

Almost three years ago, the federal government began its largest reorganization in half a century, creating the Department of Homeland Security. Today, the department is hampered by “major management challenges” which, for instance, hampered its response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, according to the inspector general’s report released Wednesday.

“While DHS has made progress, it still has much to do to establish a cohesive, efficient and effective organization,” the report says.

The report (PDF) sharply criticized the department’s response to the hurricanes, saying that “the circumstances [provide] an unprecedented opportunity for fraud, waste and abuse” and that “the sheer size of the response and recovery efforts will create an unprecedented need for oversight.”

Yes, they seem stuck on the word “unprecedented,” but the situation is indeed so.

The audit is the latest in a series of tough assessments of the beleaguered department, which has been widely criticized since it was formed in March 2003 by combining 22 disparate agencies. In a final “report card” issued earlier this month, for example, the former members of the Sept. 11 commission gave the DHS low or failing grades in many key areas, including airline passenger screening and border control.

Earlier this week, a group of House Democrats issued a report alleging that the department had failed to follow through on 33 promised improvements to border security, infrastructure protection and other programs.

In an 11-page response to the inspector general’s findings, homeland security officials acknowledged problems but disputed some of the criticisms and offered explanations for others. For example, the department said it has created a special procurement office to oversee hurricane contracts and is using consultants to monitor the process.

Department spokesman William R. “Russ” Knocke said that “retooling FEMA is one of our greatest and most urgent priorities.”

“We continue to make programs more efficient, effective and results-oriented,” Knocke said, adding that “the department is making substantial progress in implementing several core management initiatives,” including improvements in personnel policies and financial accountability.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, who took over the department this year, is in the midst of implementing a broad reorganization of the 180,000-employee department and has announced initiatives in border security and other areas.

But the department’s bumbling after Katrina prompted widespread criticism — along with the resignation of FEMA’s director — and many lawmakers have since questioned whether DHS is capable of handling recovery efforts along the Gulf Coast. White House homeland security adviser Frances Fragos Townsend is reviewing the hurricane response by DHS and other agencies. — Washington Post

But that’s not all that’s in this report. It also criticizes DHS’s accounting (yep, the books suck, too), its lack of effective oversight, the fact that their computer systems suck, the fact that it still hasn’t created a national threat database, and much more.

5 Comments → “Homeland Security management sucks”


  1. ble

    Dec 29, 2005

    One of the major errors that was created by the Bush Administration was the inclusion of FEMA under DHS. This Agency should have remained a singular agency reporting directly to the President as it was set up originally under the Clinton administration.

    When FEMA came under the DHS umbrella, it become one of the smallest agencies and thereby its budget was cut, employees were lessened, and the results was that the employees with program knowledge were either resigned, positions eliminated, or were converted to temporary employees. The Presidential appointees had not prior emergency management skill/knowledge/ability to perform the functions needed to support FEMA.

    The end result is FEMA needs to be pulled from under DHS altogether and reinstated as it was under the Clinton Administration.


  2. bbs

    Feb 21, 2006

    FEMA was not originally established by the Clinton Administration (it was established in 1979), nor was FEMA’s response to hurricanes like Floyd in the mid 90′s any better than it was during Katrina. Many residents in NC didn’t see FEMA assistance for 4 days and the level of devastation was no where near Katrina. I worked with FEMA in the mid 90′s and I can tell you that if Katrina had happened in 1998, the results would have been the same and probably worse. FEMA was broke long before DHS came along, there just wasn’t a disaster big enough before Katrina to highlight it.


  3. Michael Hampton

    Feb 21, 2006

    Bbs, the primary problem is that disaster response is handled by the government. In a situation such as Katrina, where faster is better and efficiency saves lives, and government is bureaucratic and inefficient, it’s time to re-evaluate whether FEMA should exist at all.

    We all heard the stories of Wal-Mart getting aid in long before FEMA arrived. The untold part of that story is that Wal-Mart stepped up, and many of their employees went to organize the aid, without even asking for orders from above.

    Government is simply not capable of acting in that manner.

  4. May 23, 2006


  5. I HATE YOU CUNTS

    Feb 06, 2012

    I hope you WASTES of space eat some FACES and get septicemia and DIE !!!


Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2012 Homeland Stupidity.

Bad Behavior has blocked 3475 access attempts in the last 7 days.