Federal Buffoons and Imbeciles

January 26, 2006 @ 12 Comments

Whistleblowers who worked for the National Security Agency and came forward with allegations of incompetence, espionage, lack of oversight and outright lawbreaking, were routinely harassed, intimidated, given false psychological evaluations and forced out of work, according to several whistleblowers.

Russell Tice, former NSA and Defense Intelligence Agency employee who was fired after filing complaints that a DIA employee appeared to be engaged in espionage, called the FBI “Federal Buffoons and Imbeciles” after they failed to properly investigate the complaint, he said.

A two part (1, 2) special report from Cybercast News Service goes into detail on how national security whistleblowers were harassed, intimidated and forced out of their jobs.

Former NSA officer Thomas G. Reinbold confirmed that the practice of “psychiatric abuse” inside the NSA is “very widespread.”

“They call it ‘doing a mental’ on someone,” Reinbold said, and it has a “chilling effect” on other potential whistleblowers, he added. “They fear for their careers because they fear someone will write up bad [psychological] fitness reports on them.” — Cybercast News Service

The whole thing’s well worth a read. Until wrongdoing is taken seriously and punished, there’s little hope of getting our intelligence community back on the track it should be on: protecting us from the next terrorist threat.

Next month Congress will hold hearings on the lack of protection from retaliation for national security whistleblowers. Circumstances permitting, they will be covered very closely here.

Via the Project on Government Oversight.

12 Comments → “Federal Buffoons and Imbeciles”


  1. Vampyra

    Jan 26, 2006

    This is silly. Please let the feds do their jobs.


  2. Michael Hampton

    Jan 26, 2006

    Sure. Just tell me what part of their jobs involves failing to investigate espionage allegations and harass and intimidate whistleblowers.


  3. Lenny Zimmermann

    Jan 27, 2006

    I’d say Micahel is dead on about that. It’s nto very hard at all in the intelligence comunity to scare the living daylights out of someone with very litte evidence. All that has to happen is someone saying they’ll pull your clearance. If something happens and you get any kind of report that suggests you are somehow unworthy of a particular clearance level, that’s a career killer. That’s all it takes. No clearance, no work. And if word gets out that your celarance was downgraded, that’s like saying someone is immenently untrustworthy. Your entire reputation is shot. And considering such a large part of your knowledge is wrapped up in classified material it’s even harder ot get a job outside of government because you are hampered by what little you can say you did or know, making you less marketable as a job candidate.

    All of those reasons make it all the more reasonable to be exceptionally careful about protecting the rights of those in Intelligence positions who are only trying to make sure the government realy is doing the right thing.

  4. Feb 09, 2006

  5. Feb 14, 2006

  6. Feb 14, 2006

  7. Feb 15, 2006

  8. May 15, 2006

  9. Jun 12, 2006

  10. Jul 14, 2006

  11. Jul 29, 2006


  12. diana carter

    Oct 01, 2006

    Security clearance, psychological evaluations at perry nuclear plant for long time employees who raise concerns are being treated with the same issues. I am not talking about new hires. these are employees that know the plant and know when things are not right. NRC, no help. EEOC no help It is getting worse there and no help. Thanks


Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2012 Homeland Stupidity.

Bad Behavior has blocked 3423 access attempts in the last 7 days.