Whats a matter dude ? You do not handle confrontation and challenges when they do not go your way very well.

As for “Conspiracy Realist” you’ve hit the nail on the head.

As for saying I’m an idiot, I suggest you practice using your skills of deduction before saying someone else lacks them. You deny there was any demolition until you see it’s obvious that 7 WTC was blown. Then you say the other two didn’t look like demolitions, suggesting you didn’t check to see what a demolition looks like, because they do look like demolitions, as one or two newscasters commented. In that footage you looked at the cutter charges going off can be seen. What did you mean, “That’s only a theory”?

And what does it mean, “Those are ‘conspiracy theories’”? Gibberish. You have been preprogrammed to not look at things because they were labeled this way.

Which is how a handful of people with titles of office, lawyers, newspapers, military personnel munitions can commit this kind of slaughter. Now we have to worry they’re going to bump off a bunch of us next, to get us into taxpaying herd so they can go invade someone else.

That’s what’s going on, you know. It’s really quite simple. To your credit, you at least want to get a stateful of people who vote for no one to have the authority to set these things in motion. (But like the Leftists, you do seem barely civilized enough to be permitted around the family dog, let alone live next door to. Your recruitment method is to call people stupid when you can barely get 2% in an election? Good luck, Einstein.)

Okay, your turn. Be a man and go back to doing something useful. If you continue you may tempt me yet again.

At the beginning, I asked for facts, and you have given nothing but theories as silly as the pancake theory. Go do some REAL investigation, and come back when you have something substantive, like a damaged piece of steel or something.

I never said I had all the answers, or even a coherent idea of what really happened. Unlike you, my mind is open on this point. And unlike you, I’m waiting for ACTUAL EVIDENCE before I believe something which is, well, quite difficult to believe.

Now go away and get the hell off my site. Don’t come back until you have some evidence that would stand up in court.

Well, you will ultimately lose this silly argument. If you aren’t simply up to something I think you will be embarrassed in retrospect. I think I have you figured out, though. You’re just into talking. You ignored 7 WTC until I provided the footage; presumably you also saw Silverstein speak. Then you said 7 WTC was clearly demolished, as though you had not previously ignored it. And maintained that the first two were not obviously blown. You seem to be making this up as you go along and are not conversant in the topic. If you were a Disinfo Dickhead probably you would have said there must have been a good reason the other two were blown. In any case the information content of your insistent commentary is again not up to snuff, like that of a thousand other self-styled leaders and pundits.

What’s in store for us next may well make these moments seem utterly inconsequential. That’s actually what concerns me; I am warning you to get clear of this mess so you can survive.

I am so horrified by what the people who blew the buildings up are doing in Iraq and abroad I am not sure I care if I am in the next disaster. They have the means and are moving forward at the moment. Only a revolt among the brass or the troops getting fed up will stop it. So long as they can continue to issue orders to move personnel and weapons, they’re gonna do that. The most the handful of people with enough of their cognitive abilities intact to perceive this can do is to split the scene, or at least warn others to. But people are so deluded I mostly don’t bother.

But I’m glad you pointed me back at those crystal clear videos showing the north tower and south tower collapsing, because they don’t look like controlled demolition at all!

Your round ball is kind of flat. Needs more hot air, I think.