<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Windows less secure than Linux: The FSM proof</title> <atom:link href="http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/04/17/windows-less-secure-than-linux-the-fsm-proof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/04/17/windows-less-secure-than-linux-the-fsm-proof/</link> <description>Protect yourself from government gaffes, bureaucratic blunders and incumbent incompetence</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:19:36 -0400</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/04/17/windows-less-secure-than-linux-the-fsm-proof/#comment-9292</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 08:01:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ioerror.us/2006/04/17/windows-less-secure-than-linux-the-fsm-proof/#comment-9292</guid> <description>You would think something so significantly integrated would have much less system calls.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think something so significantly integrated would have much less system calls.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/19 queries in 0.010 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.homelandstupidity.us

Served from: www.homelandstupidity.us @ 2010-08-01 02:12:45 -->