Seattle Schools push socialism, call non-socialists racist

June 1, 2006 @ 5 Comments

If you want to make a better life for yourself, if you have long-range goals, or if you reject collective ideologies such as socialism and Communism, Seattle Public Schools say you’re a racist.

Until this morning that was the shocking line on their web site, since removed but still visible in the Google cached copy, in which the school system defines what constitutes “cultural racism.” Funny, they seem to also think that only white people can be racist, as well.

Those aspects of society that overtly and covertly attribute value and normality to white people and Whiteness, and devalue, stereotype, and label people of color as “other”, different, less than, or render them invisible. Examples of these norms include defining white skin tones as nude or flesh colored, having a future time orientation, emphasizing individualism as opposed to a more collective ideology, defining one form of English as standard, and identifying only Whites as great writers or composers. — Seattle Public Schools

So Andrew Coulson wrote up a little guest column about it in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, and the page quickly disappeared.

See if this sounds familiar: a government agency redefining a highly charged word to advance a particular ideology. … Um, note to the Seattle School Board and administration: George Orwell’s novel “1984″ was a cautionary tale, not a how-to book. And the folks trying to control people’s thoughts through state manipulation of the language — they were the bad guys. — Seattle Post-Intelligencer

As long as there is only one official system of schooling, for which everyone must pay, everyone will demand that it reflect their own views and reject views they oppose. In a pluralistic society, that’s just not possible. The inevitable result is an endless battle over the content of the curriculum.

The solution, as I point out in the P-I op-ed, is school choice. — Andrew Coulson

School choice would solve a whole lot of other problems as well, not least of which are the creationism-evolution debate and the overall decline of American educational standards — which are declining so far so fast, now, that the Department of Education has had to try to suppress the evidence of the decline.

5 Comments → “Seattle Schools push socialism, call non-socialists racist”


  1. Not Disclosed

    Jun 02, 2006

    I don’t think that the title is a fair summary of the Seattle Schools’ statement.

    It doesn’t sound like anyone is “pushing socialism”. In fact, there’s not even any evidence that this is a reference to economics (or do you routinely call capitalist economics “individual economics”?).

    Here’s a real world example. Japan is certainly a capitalist nation, but societally it’s much more collectivist than America.


  2. Michael Hampton

    Jun 02, 2006

    It sounded socialist to me. And it’s certainly a socialist agenda that they’re advancing. It’s quite common in U.S. government-run schools, unfortunately.


  3. J. Bruno

    Jun 02, 2006

    Actually, yes, Not Disclosed. Capitalism is the economics of indivdualism, socialism that of collectivism. You cannot advocate one philosophy without its corresponding economic system. What irritates me is that no one is offended by collectivism itself.


  4. Andy Skelton

    Jun 02, 2006

    Elective collectivism is okay though, isn’t it?


  5. Mark Jaquith

    Jun 05, 2006

    If you want to form a Kibbutz, go ahead. But not even the most die-hard communist or socialist thinks that their systems would work on a broader scale if it were optional.


Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2012 Homeland Stupidity.

Bad Behavior has blocked 3587 access attempts in the last 7 days.