Reality-based education

June 19, 2006 @ Michael Hampton8 Comments

We know how to teach children to read. The techniques are well known and private schools and tutoring systems do it all the time. One of the best known examples is Sylvan Learning Center, which guarantees to improve a child’s math or reading skills “by one full grade level equivalent in only 36 hours of instruction.” Why can’t public schools teach children to read?

The answer, of course, is government bureaucracy resistant to change, saysNew York Times columnist Brent Staples. He cites the poor performance of the Washington, D.C., school district as a prime example, saying its “leadership . . . appears to have been invested in unproved strategies and business as usual.”

In this stark reality which will surely confound more liberal readers, it is the private schools which provide the safety net for those the public school system fails. This is most especially true for students with so-called learning disabilities.

As it turns out, in public schools, many children wind up labeled “learning disabled” when the problem is with the curriculum, not the student.

Some severely disabled children will always need be educated outside the public system. But many of the so-called learning-disabled children who flee public schools for private education are victims of disastrous reading instruction.

Nearly all of these children could be reached through methods like those that have been used for decades at specialized schools or that have recently been touted in the research literature. It won’t be easy to put these programs in place. But with the dollar costs of special education spiraling upward — and the dangers of mass illiteracy painfully clear — there’s no time like the present to get started. — New York Times

Wait a minute, the public schools are dismal failures, especially with severely disabled children, and the private schools are picking up the slack?

“This kind of reality-based heresy could easily get Mr. Staples rhetorically stoned by public school zealots,” said Cato Institute policy analyst Neal McCluskey. “It’s also the kind of heresy that needs to be repeated over, and over, and over again.”

Okay. Public institutions will always need a private safety net to catch those who fall through the cracks of the public system, always poorly run, wasteful and ineffective in comparison with their private counterparts.

What they certainly don’t need is for another government to come in and take them over, as has happened in Chicago, Boston, Detroit, and elsewhere.

“What the children of Chicago, L.A., and every other American city and town need is not more central planning from the mayor’s office or the statehouse,” said Andrew Coulson, director for Cato’s Center for Educational Freedom. “What they need is the ability to easily kiss bad schools goodbye and transfer to better ones.”

This is true everywhere, even in the poorest parts of Africa, where people know government schools don’t work, and even go so far as to pay what is for them significant amounts of money to enroll their children in illegal private schools in order to give them a better education, while massive foreign aid poured into countries’ state-run education systems goes to waste, like a canteen poured out in the desert.

Online Education Degrees University programs listed by degree and college

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

8 Comments → “Reality-based education”


  1. Q

    Jun 19, 2006

    they should just give sylvan complete control over the board of education and call it a day.

    Reply
  2. Jun 19, 2006

    Reply
  3. Jun 20, 2006

    Reply

  4. Tito

    Jun 20, 2006

    I will point out that Sylvan does this with one on one instruction and is vastly more expensive than your standard public school budget. Not saying I disagree with public schools being horrible, and needing to be able to transfer (vouchers would be great). However, if we wanted to get the sylvan kind of education out to all students, it would cost a ton more than we are currently paying, as evidenced by their rates. Smaller class sizes and skilled educators will nearly always produced vastly better results.

    Reply

  5. Michael Hampton

    Jun 20, 2006

    I use Sylvan only as an example. You can find numerous other examples in your nearest phone book. (Do people use those anymore?)

    Reply
  6. Jun 20, 2006

    Reply

  7. Quincy

    Jun 25, 2006

    Tito –

    KIPP academies and some other charters (such as Amistad Academy in the Northeast) teach reading and math, along with the other skills needed for success in the higher grades with lower per-pupil spending and mainly at risk kid, so it can be done with a similar resources to public schools. It also means that school systems like NYC and Washington, which each spend $12,000+ per pupil per year, compared to $7,000/pupil/year in the average KIPP Academy, should hang their ineffective heads in shame for dereliction of duty.

    Reply

  8. wheatdogg

    Jul 03, 2006

    Politics and infighting have hampered reading instruction for years. Rather than trying multiple methods of teaching kids how to read, too often the public schools fall victim to the latest “fad” in teaching reading. The readers that are used are mindnumbingly boring, since they have been crafted to fit into some expert’s reading “program.” Wise elementary school teachers have their kids read trade children’s books, like the Caldecott winners and Dr. Seuss, in addition to the programmed readers. It’s the top-down nature of public school pedagogy that hampers reading success.

    Private schools and Sylvan centers are more flexible in their approaches to reading instruction, and give teachers more latitude in teaching reading.

    You might also consider the demographics when making your generalizations. Typically, students in private schools and Sylvan centers are either more motivated than their public school peers, or have parents who are more involved in their education than public school students’ peers. Either way, you get kids who are initially more predisposed to learning to read (English) than in the public schools.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2010 Homeland Stupidity.