Within the next five years, the federal government will implode, losing up to half its workforce, and up to 70 percent of its most senior staff, to retirement, creating a significant “brain drain” all across the government.
This is easily the best news I’ve heard all week.
Over the next five years, over half of the federal government workforce is likely to retire, completely gutting vital agencies like the Centers for Disease Control, the Internal Revenue Service and Veterans Affairs. The higher up the management chain, the worse the problem; among top government officials, almost 70% are primed to retire. A culture of denial has set in, and the very people responsible to fix it are the ones who are going to ditch. Many agencies will enter an embarrassing phase of ineptitude, caused by a lack of staff or a newly hired and inexperienced staff.
Get ready to hate your government again. Unless a radical new stance is taken and some laws are changed, we will see the effects of this brain drain everywhere. . . .
You might think hiring people is easy, but there are both cultural and bureaucratic obstacles preventing them from succeeding. For instance, three agencies tried an “Extreme Hiring Makeover” to reduce the Kafka-esque process of getting a job. Hiring a new employee at one of those agencies now takes only 53 steps — rather than 114. But it’s still 53 steps! — Time
Wait, we don’t already hate the government for its embarrassing ineptitude? The government should be doing less, not more, anyway. I say let the attrition happen!
The brain drain has already started, in fact; the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is casting an “unusually wide net” for senior staff. You can tell the net is unusually wide because they’re headhunting at the American Civil Liberties Union.
Timothy H. Edgar, a prominent critic of Bush Administration national security policies with the American Civil Liberties Union, has joined the ODNI staff.
“I have recently taken a job as deputy to Alex Joel, the Civil Liberties Protection Officer in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence,” he wrote in an email message to former colleagues last week.
“This was a position that Congress mandated in the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 and it reports directly to the DNI.”
“The new job is challenging and I am looking forward to continuing to defend civil liberties within the government,” Mr. Edgar wrote. — Secrecy News
Time suggested that the federal government needs to “wake up to the modern age, using recruiters and newspaper advertising” to find qualified candidates for nearly a million positions which will open up nationwide in the next few years. “They might even need to run an ad during the Super Bowl.”
I suggest that Congress should simply cut the size of government to match the attrition levels.
(Hat tip)
Matt
Jul 20, 2006
Good news. I’d be even better if its enforcement arm crumbled.
GRAYWOLF
Jul 20, 2006
“Many agencies will enter an embarrassing phase of ineptitude”
Enter…do they actually think this will be a new thing?
Nikhil Rao
Jul 21, 2006
Or they may streamline and become that much more efficient. Mom’s worked in government all her life (VA doctor). I’ve had a couple of part time and temporary positions. The waste I see all around me is incredible. I actually vomit with self-loathing every day when I come home, knowledgeable that I’m a part of that waste.
Bunsen
Jul 22, 2006
Now wait a minute. I’m all for smaller government, most particularly when it positively affects the people. This isn’t good news. This is pandemonium – the three agencies they list are VA, CDC, and the IRS? I think I’d rather like to keep those three *especially.* Couldn’t we get rid of most of congress or something? Shut down some oversight committees? Streamline the postal service? Close redundant agencies such as ATF and DEA? Cut back on our use of three million dollar missiles as pre-war explosive eye candy and use that money to help keep necessary functions of government running?
Smaller government is only better if you get rid of the parts that are inefficient, bad, or faulty. And even still, bad government is better than no government at all.
Blah
Jul 25, 2006
Attrition of the workforce due to retirement is a something that everyone should have been thinking about a long time ago. But instead of figuring out creative ways of handling the loss of the majority of the government, they decide to hire a whole slew of new employees. So, in another 20-30 years, this will happen again because the new surge of people will be retiring.
Granted, the government doesn’t treat its employees well. Compared to private industry, pay and benefits suck. Retirment plan isn’t all that great any more (since the mid-80s). the only people who stick around now are the ones who think they are making a difference.
I’m looking for a new job after 2 years of service. There’s only so much B.S. you can take.
Aug 18, 2006
Paulison: FEMA ready despite being understaffed - Homeland Stupidity
Sep 02, 2006
Paulison: Increase the size of FEMA - Homeland Stupidity
Sep 16, 2006
The CIA’s lame recruiting commercial - Homeland Stupidity