Fifth phone numbers station: 613-686-3106

July 21, 2006 @ Michael Hampton18 Comments

The Craigslist spy has struck again.

On Wednesday night, a message appeared on Ottawa Craigslist Missed Connections “For Mein Fraulein,” asking her to call. When one calls the number, a recording plays which is reminiscent of Cold War-era shortwave numbers stations. Only these stations are set up on Voice over Internet Protocol telephone numbers.

The recorded message starts out with a few seconds of A-Ha’s Little Black Heart, reads groups of numbers twice, and ends with the same few seconds of the song, like the four before it.

And the message on Craigslist read:

For Mein Fraulein

Mein Fraulein,

Do not fear the cold. I have a blanket for you. Call me.

613 //// 686 //// 3106

The telephone number belongs to Group Telecom, which was recently purchased by Bell Canada.

Because I’m currently at the HOPE conference, I was unable to make a recording of the call. But reader Fortyseven was able to create a recording and it is now available. In the meantime, the following is a transcription of the message:

Group 022
01408 20030 10001 02006 80180
18117 08001 30270 00014 01000
50690 27078 10004 00630 99063
03306 70100 17000 07307 80120
00023 02200 10720 82017

While many people have worked on the last four, no one has yet come up with a solution. This fifth message is much shorter than the previous four, but even so, it might help. And with that, I return to HOPE Number Six.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

18 Comments → “Fifth phone numbers station: 613-686-3106”


  1. Fortyseven

    Jul 21, 2006

    If I was at home I’d record it, but on this box here at work I’m very limited. :P

    Reply

  2. Fortyseven

    Jul 21, 2006

    I know we can’t be completely sure any of these are ‘authentic’ but do we know of any others that are known to be fake besides the 2600-related one?

    I ask because I’m have no idea if there’s a lot of (obvious) copy-cats out there or not. I’m just kind of trying to get a feel for the phenomenon.

    Is this literally the fifth (sixth?) one discovered since this story originally broke, or are there a handful of previous fakes that are considered briefly and then ignored as hoax?

    It’s, of course, curious that this one is shorter and has a Canadian phone number…naturally the gears of suspicion begin to grind.

    Reply

  3. Michael Hampton

    Jul 21, 2006

    If this one is a copycat, it’s a much better one than Mike from Off The Hook put together. I didn’t consider that whoever was doing this might post something in a Canada forum, so I missed it first time around. Oh well.

    Reply

  4. Bunsen

    Jul 22, 2006

    I’m going to go with my previous belief that I stated with #4?/#3, maybe? that whether or not we feel it may be legitimate, we should consider the attention these messages have gotten and assume that any message after #1 is most likely “tainted,” either as a copycat or a misdirection.

    Reply

  5. Bunsen

    Jul 22, 2006

    Also, I think that the spacing of these messages procludes the possibility that this is a Guerrilla advertising campaign as some others have claimed – if it were, I think that we would have seen them more frequently than five messages in almost two months. Maybe, obviously, I’m wrong – but my official stance on this is that these are either legitimate, and uncrackable because we have no pad, or more likely copy-cats or attention whoring, and uncrackable because they aren’t a real code.

    However, I am very taken by erithid’s work on the binary frequency graphs, and am interested in seeing whether or not he can make anything out of this new message if it works out for him.

    Reply

  6. Anarchyx67

    Jul 22, 2006

    I still think the “3″ sounds odd, more like “T”. I know it’s probably just the guys voice used for that number. But it does still sound odd compared to the rest of the numbers.

    It’s 8:30 AM CST and the phone # is still active…

    Reply

  7. Brian Knowles

    Jul 22, 2006

    Is anyone working on the idea that the music constitutes an encoded keword? It’s pretty obvious, but I thought I’d ask..

    Reply

  8. Anarchyx67

    Jul 22, 2006

    The music containing an encoded keyword? Like how? It’s the same musical loop everytime. Or do you mean something deeper?

    I know the “sender” won’t respond, but I did send an email tot he Craigslist address the “spy” used asking them to at least drop a hint that this is a fake, or if it is legit, or whatever.

    I have a few other ideas that might help get a “response” but am not going to publically share them. Just some ideas I’m coming up with. Mainly because these messages are starting to irritate me. :-) I mean seriously…

    I do hope the NSA is working on these as well, to put a stop to them.

    Reply

  9. b

    Jul 23, 2006

    Here’s what I can tell you. Every grouping of five here, with the exception of 17000, shows up in the value of pi taken to 1 million places. See http://turner.faculty.swau.edu/pi/pi1000000.html

    Reply

  10. b

    Jul 23, 2006

    so i went back and checked the others. same thing. almost every sequence of five digits appears in pi. for those that don’t appear, moving the fifth digit to the first place produces a sequence that does appear in pi.

    now the bad news: the same patterns emerge in the fake fourth phone message, so i guess this is all just coincidence.

    it was a nice theory while it lasted.

    Reply

  11. Winston

    Jul 23, 2006

    If you try just about any series of 5 numbers, you’ll find them in PI to a million places.

    Reply

  12. Deezy

    Jul 24, 2006

    Yea someone should call CNN and let them know about this ;)

    Reply

  13. acoward

    Jul 24, 2006

    If my math is correct, the probability of not finding a 5 digit sequence in the first million digits of PI with the assumption that PI’s digits are uniformally distributed, is ~1:22000
    You’d have a hard time finding such a sequence.

    Reply

  14. ipdb

    Jul 24, 2006

    pi holds no relevance to this. ;)

    Reply

  15. b

    Jul 24, 2006

    ok, i get the point. ;P

    Reply

  16. SKYWALKER107

    Jul 24, 2006

    hey IPDB you gonna add these 2 new groupings to your website for checking diffeent cyphers?

    Reply

  17. logiczero

    Jul 26, 2006

    This may have been brought up in comments in one of the other posts, but has anyone considered that this is one of those clever Google job postings, where the person who solves is clearly intelligent enough to work at Google?

    Reply

  18. Krusty

    Feb 22, 2007

    If this was a code sent using a “one-time-pad” then there is no way to crack it (unless they reused the same pad on the different messages).

    Obviously the recepient/sender wasn’t worried about being marked since a transmission over a phone line can be traced.

    Had this been a covert opp, they would have received the message via a shortwave numberstation.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2010 Homeland Stupidity.