<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
> <channel><title>Comments on: State secrets privilege denied in AT&amp;T lawsuit</title> <atom:link href="http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/07/23/state-secrets-privilege-denied-in-at/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/07/23/state-secrets-privilege-denied-in-at/</link> <description>Protect yourself from government gaffes, bureaucratic blunders and incumbent incompetence</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:19:36 -0400</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: AT&#38;T surveillance lawsuit still alive - Homeland Stupidity</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/07/23/state-secrets-privilege-denied-in-at/#comment-20856</link> <dc:creator>AT&#38;T surveillance lawsuit still alive - Homeland Stupidity</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:05:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/07/23/state-secrets-privilege-denied-in-att-lawsuit/#comment-20856</guid> <description>[...] The Department of Justice asserted that litigating the case would reveal national security secrets, causing exceptionally grave damage to the national security, and moved to dismiss the case. In July, U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker denied the government&#8217;s motion to dismiss, ruling that &#8220;because the very subject matter of this litigation has been so publicly aired . . . dismissing this case at the outset would sacrifice liberty for no apparent enhancement of security.&#8221; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Department of Justice asserted that litigating the case would reveal national security secrets, causing exceptionally grave damage to the national security, and moved to dismiss the case. In July, U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker denied the government&#8217;s motion to dismiss, ruling that &#8220;because the very subject matter of this litigation has been so publicly aired . . . dismissing this case at the outset would sacrifice liberty for no apparent enhancement of security.&#8221; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Judge rules NSA surveillance program illegal - Homeland Stupidity</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/07/23/state-secrets-privilege-denied-in-at/#comment-14524</link> <dc:creator>Judge rules NSA surveillance program illegal - Homeland Stupidity</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:52:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/07/23/state-secrets-privilege-denied-in-att-lawsuit/#comment-14524</guid> <description>[...] In that case, the judge rejected the government&#8217;s motion to dismiss under the state secrets privilege, and a number of other lawsuits filed around the country were consolidated with that case in a decision last week. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In that case, the judge rejected the government&#8217;s motion to dismiss under the state secrets privilege, and a number of other lawsuits filed around the country were consolidated with that case in a decision last week. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carl M</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/07/23/state-secrets-privilege-denied-in-at/#comment-13396</link> <dc:creator>Carl M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:24:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/07/23/state-secrets-privilege-denied-in-att-lawsuit/#comment-13396</guid> <description>AT&amp;T went away for some time, and was a name that was becomming unpopular. I guess now we see just how AT&amp;T got their &quot;fresh boost&quot;. Gov&#039;t funds...Stupid AT&amp;T, may you go down hard!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T went away for some time, and was a name that was becomming unpopular. I guess now we see just how AT&amp;T got their &#8220;fresh boost&#8221;. Gov&#8217;t funds&#8230;</p><p>Stupid AT&amp;T, may you go down hard!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/19 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.homelandstupidity.us

Served from: www.homelandstupidity.us @ 2010-08-01 02:04:04 -->