Mr. Bush tried to drag the U.N. into Iraq. But that did not happen. If Mr. Bush had listened to others, he might have still been seen as a competent president – but not now.

While it may have been good judgment on the part of the U.N.s Iraq war strategy, I question its apparent silence on the continued humiliation of the Tasmanian people.

A British museum wants to mess with the bones of the Tasmanian dead – murdered by those wandering British settlers (including the criminals dumped from British prisons). They are messing with the bones not, of some ancient unknown civilization but known human beings who were murdered by gun toting settlers.

The U.S. under Bush doesn’t even pretend to care. All church denominations don’t seem to care. And the U.N., perhaps frightened out of its wits by Mr. Bush’s representative to the U.N.(Mr. Bolton)
doesn’t seem to have its “groove back”.

Are they hypocrites, jealous, socialist, whiners or all of the above?

Do they think they can get the US to do what they want moreso than other countries who are more quick to tell them what to do with their reports?

If we ever pass this thing (which we’ve already signed and already have had judges cite in rulings), we might as well give it up.

It isn’t about human rights for children, but about controlling how what is left of the free world raises its children.

This is the same UN which thinks “human rights” means everyone has the “right” to an oppressive government which provides everyone a place to live, good health, high taxes, and indoctrination to convince everyone that this is somehow all good. And if you don’t like being forced at gunpoint to pay for providing all these “rights” to your neighbor, you have the “right” to be thrown in jail.

No thanks. I think I’d rather get the U.S. out of the UN and then throw them out of the country.