<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge rules NSA surveillance program illegal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/</link>
	<description>Protect yourself from government gaffes, bureaucratic blunders and incumbent incompetence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The news just keeps breaking - Homeland Stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10811</link>
		<dc:creator>The news just keeps breaking - Homeland Stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10811</guid>
		<description>[...] of the NSA, last week the federal Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned an August 2006 decision that held that the NSA&#8217;s terrorist surveillance program was unconstitutional. The program [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the NSA, last week the federal Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned an August 2006 decision that held that the NSA&#8217;s terrorist surveillance program was unconstitutional. The program [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hampton</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10810</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10810</guid>
		<description>Q, you saw &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/10/04/nsa-surveillance-ok-pending-court-appeal/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the update&lt;/a&gt;, and you even left a comment on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q, you saw <a href="http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/10/04/nsa-surveillance-ok-pending-court-appeal/" rel="nofollow">the update</a>, and you even left a comment on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10809</link>
		<dc:creator>Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10809</guid>
		<description>so what&#039;s the status on this? it&#039;s way past September 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what&#8217;s the status on this? it&#8217;s way past September 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T surveillance lawsuit still alive - Homeland Stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10808</link>
		<dc:creator>AT&#38;T surveillance lawsuit still alive - Homeland Stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10808</guid>
		<description>[...] In a separate case, a federal judge in Michigan ruled that the NSA terrorist surveillance program was unconstitutional. The government is being allowed to continue the program while it pursues an appeal.    Comments RSS - Trackback URI [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a separate case, a federal judge in Michigan ruled that the NSA terrorist surveillance program was unconstitutional. The government is being allowed to continue the program while it pursues an appeal.    Comments RSS &#8211; Trackback URI [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NSA surveillance OK pending court appeal - Homeland Stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10807</link>
		<dc:creator>NSA surveillance OK pending court appeal - Homeland Stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 02:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10807</guid>
		<description>[...] The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay (PDF) of U.S. District Court Judge Anna Diggs Taylor&#8217;s order that the program, which President Bush has called &#8220;critical to our national security,&#8221; be halted. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay (PDF) of U.S. District Court Judge Anna Diggs Taylor&#8217;s order that the program, which President Bush has called &#8220;critical to our national security,&#8221; be halted. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanomid</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10806</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanomid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10806</guid>
		<description>Activist judge&#039;s ruling will be overturned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Activist judge&#8217;s ruling will be overturned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10805</link>
		<dc:creator>Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 13:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10805</guid>
		<description>at first i was reading this and got really happy; then as i read on i started to get the feeling that this is all just part of the show to pacify the public.  anyone get that feeling after reading this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at first i was reading this and got really happy; then as i read on i started to get the feeling that this is all just part of the show to pacify the public.  anyone get that feeling after reading this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CFisher</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10804</link>
		<dc:creator>CFisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10804</guid>
		<description>What?

You mean a federal judge actually bothered to read that constitution thing? That is justâ€¦ shocking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?</p>
<p>You mean a federal judge actually bothered to read that constitution thing? That is justâ€¦ shocking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10803</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/17/judge-rules-nsa-surveillance-program-illegal/#comment-10803</guid>
		<description>It is great to see a judge that actually seems to be looking out to uphold our constitutional rights. Thank you lord!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is great to see a judge that actually seems to be looking out to uphold our constitutional rights. Thank you lord!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.071 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 15:03:34 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
