Property Rights in 21st Century America

September 27, 2006 @ Michael Hampton5 Comments

After the Supreme Court’s 2005 eminent domain decision, saying that a government can take any property it wants for any reason it wants, or no reason at all, what is the future of property rights in America?

This is the theme of a new book by Timothy Sandefur, Cornerstone of Liberty: Property Rights in 21st Century America, on which he spoke at the Cato Institute last week. (Listen to MP3)

Your usual Cato Institute event is pretty dry, and only of interest to serious policy wonks, but this one veered completely off the “dry, boring” track fairly quickly.

Cornerstone of Liberty: Property Rights in 21st Century America

First off, Sandefur’s talk was easily accessible and much less dry than one would expect. He laid out pretty quickly where things stand with respect to eminent domain abuse today, and where things are likely to go in the future. It’s worth listening to just for that.

Surprisingly, the Cato Institute actually managed to find someone to come in and defend eminent domain, and the book forum is worth listening to or watching simply to hear Georgetown University professor John Echeverria, who has written quite a bit in defense of eminent domain and regulatory takings, try to defend the government stealing people’s property from under them and destroy the property’s value through environmental regulations.

At one point during the question and answer session, the debate became quite heated, and I was under the impression that people were actually going to begin fighting. With their fists, chairs or whatever else was at hand. You just don’t normally see things get quite that heated in Washington.

At another point, an audience member said that he participated in civil disobedience against the city of Kansas City, Mo., for trying to tell him what he could do with his land, and proposed an interesting way of possibly stopping an eminent domain action in its tracks. You’ll have to listen to see what he said.

You’ll also have to listen for yourself, and buy the book, to see what Sandefur says about why you shouldn’t be fooled by states passing laws which purport to restrict eminent domain, and what exactly is the future of property rights in America.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

5 Comments → “Property Rights in 21st Century America”


  1. Whimspiration

    Sep 28, 2006

    This subject is big on my list of watched items at the moment.
    Thank you for covering it and providing the exciting links. *smile*
    I’m sure they will provide fuel for hours exciting converstaion.

    Reply

  2. Al (free-thinker)

    Sep 28, 2006

    We have no property rights in America,(so called “land of the free”), in regards to real estate, if you do not pay property taxes, your land or property will be seized by the government, even if you owe $1 and refuse to pay. Therefore, property owners are renters, that pay the government rent to be on the land we supposably own. So of course the government passes a law of eminent domain, it is their land and you are just permanent renter until you don’t pay taxes or they use eminent domain.

    Reply
  3. Sep 28, 2006

    Reply

  4. forstand

    Sep 29, 2006

    Comment to Al:

    I remember during the ‘Nam protests a young man in Denver (?) refused to pay the excise taxes on his telephone bill because the tax was used to fund the war in Vietnam. Then his car was leined and sold for unpaid taxes. Imagine that: the government seized his car because of a telephone tax that was not paid to AT&T to pass to the government. AT&T did not lein the car, the government did. It wanted to make an example of this young man.

    Our government has been getting more and more arrogant. Is there a chance for change for the better anytime soon? My belief is no.

    I googled this and found that this excise tax is being protested even today Google “excise tax telephone protest vietnam denver” and good stuff comes up.

    Unfortunately I could not find information about the Vietnam seizure.

    Reply

  5. Q

    Oct 01, 2006

    That’s right people, keep signing your rights away in the name of “freedom” and “security”. it’s so freaking ironic; i can’t decide whether to laugh or cry…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2010 Homeland Stupidity.