The Air Force A-10 close air support jet is what goes in when soldiers on the ground call for air support. But most of the 356 jets in service have radios that have trouble communicating securely with ground troops, while a $60 million radio upgrade has been put off due to budget constraints.
The Air Force only has 63 newer radios for the jets which can communicate securely without a three-to-five second delay that could result in a friendly fire incident, Air Combat Command officials said.
The new AN/ARC-210 radios do not have a delay in secure communication, and the Air Force has been rotating them in and out of jets as they enter and leave the Iraq and Afghanistan areas.
“This rotatable pool of radios we have now is okay, but with all the wear and tear due to frequently moving them from jet to jet, their lives are shortened,” said Maj. Don Henry, ACC A-10 Program Element Monitor at Langley Air Force Base. “In a few years, we’ll need more radios to replace the 63 we already have, or we can just go ahead and buy enough for all 356 jets and reduce the wear and tear of what we have now.”
Otherwise, with the old radios, something like this could happen:
How’s this for a hair-raising wartime moment?
A soldier under siege in Iraq radios for help from above, summoning aid from an A-10 attack jet. But the pilot can’t hear the first three to five seconds of what the soldier is saying.
“The soldier could be saying ‘hold your fire,’ but all the pilot hears is ‘fire,’” said 1st Lt. Natasha Waggoner, a spokeswoman at Air Combat Command. . . .
Target identification already is tricky in places like Iraq, where insurgents blend in with the local population and “good guys are right next to the bad guys,” Henry said.
“It’s a risk we’ve had to deal with up to this point, but it’s not an acceptable risk anymore,” he said. “The A-10s need this new radio desperately.”
So far, no known fatalities have resulted from the radio glitch, but the situation is a tragedy waiting to happen, Henry said. — Arizona Daily Star
No organization, least of all the military, likes to release bad news. But Air Combat Command staffers said that their hope was that Congress would find the money for the new radios somewhere, before the tragedy waiting to happen actually happened.
Maybe if Congress quit spending money on bridges to nowhere and other pork-barrel crap, our military would have the equipment they need.
Lord Chancellor U.K.
Oct 15, 2006
That us air force _obsolete_ good old radio communication
friendly fire magic fits very well with the British Army:
Conséquences Corée du Nord. Un échantillon. Les armées occidentales à rompre?
L’armée américaine peut-elle conduire une guerre très probablement sans l’armée britannique?Tout à fait sûrement!
“Une flotte très vieille de juste huit Chinooks[une désignation pour un hélicoptère britannique] travaille vingt-quatre heures sur vingt-quatre heures pour fournir et renforcer des soldats britanniques dans les avant-postes à distance faisant face à des vagues des attaques talibans[sur la ligne Kandahar Quedda-Waziristan]. Le seul Chinook dans les Malouines[MALWINAS] a été emporté pour l’usage dans la campagne “Medusa”Operation Enduring Freedom”" en grande Perse étendue et en ce que l’on appelle Afghanistan”["MoD forced to hire civilian helicopters in Afghanistan" Arabic News, Lundi 16.10.2006 Pakistan Dawn].
Actual Human
Oct 17, 2006
My father worked as an engineer at a non-profit military contractor on the redesign of the A10’s comm system back in 1995. I do not recall whether the USAF eventually retrofitted their fleet to include the new package. As the A10 has been consistently on the verge of retirement since the 80s, I doubt that the USAF made the investment.
The A-10 story reminds me of post-Korea, pre-Vietnam military air combat thinking, that whiz-bang technology had obviated the need for dog fighting capability. In the flashy future of tomorrow, war is conducted by missile and mission statement. Not close in fighting and not by close air support.
Well, not so much. We paid for the naiveté of the pentagon leadership and the civilian clowns above them then as we do now and always will. There is no way around it: war is complex; correct strategy is often boring, and there is too much money to be made selling snake oil. Advocating responsible allocation of funds ends carriers and certainly precludes entry into the profit-driven side of the private sector. So, we have F22 raptors of questionable deterrent value replacing tried & true dog fighters and shitty ground support capability. Welcome to the exciting world of tomorrow.