<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Former Homeland Security press aide sentenced to prison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/</link>
	<description>Protect yourself from government gaffes, bureaucratic blunders and incumbent incompetence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr. kenney</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12176</link>
		<dc:creator>mr. kenney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 20:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12176</guid>
		<description>how is it legal for an officer to issue a ticket for an underage drinker,just because that drinker said they were at the persons house but thats not where they were picked up.And second is it legal for an officer of which you have a bad history with,to sit in someones drive a couple down from your and just wait for people to leave your house because the officer is assuming that that person is drunk,with no actually facts.Please help me figure this out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how is it legal for an officer to issue a ticket for an underage drinker,just because that drinker said they were at the persons house but thats not where they were picked up.And second is it legal for an officer of which you have a bad history with,to sit in someones drive a couple down from your and just wait for people to leave your house because the officer is assuming that that person is drunk,with no actually facts.Please help me figure this out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dora</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12175</link>
		<dc:creator>Dora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12175</guid>
		<description>Lee, thanks for your response.  Seems like the longest month of my life, yet it flew by, I can completely relate to the fluctuations.  Do you have any advice on the type of prison to recommend my father be put in to the judge?  From your own experience with the same issue I would again appreciate any advice.  I have concerns, obviously, for his well-being.  Thanks for sharing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee, thanks for your response.  Seems like the longest month of my life, yet it flew by, I can completely relate to the fluctuations.  Do you have any advice on the type of prison to recommend my father be put in to the judge?  From your own experience with the same issue I would again appreciate any advice.  I have concerns, obviously, for his well-being.  Thanks for sharing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12174</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12174</guid>
		<description>hello Dora,

something similar also happened to my father.  he looked at child pornography online after stumbling across it via other websites.  he himself was abused (by very *religious* grandparents i would add) as a child and due to this wanted to hassle people that distributed the pictures he had seen.  he went into a chatroom and pretended to be someone else and offered to meet up with an FBI agent (who was also pretending to be someone else).  he did so, he says, to inconvenience the man because it was a 4 hour drive for the FBI agent and 2 hours for my dad (to the agreed upon location).  he stood the guy up (obviously), but a few weeks later, he was arrested for owning illegal pictures of a minor engaged in sexual activity.  as with your situation, my father never abused me when i was a child.

i don&#039;t want to alarm you anymore than i&#039;m sure you already are, but my dad did receive 5 years in federal prison.  my father was also in his late 50s when he was arrested.  i fluctuate between being so angry at him for being that dumb and also angry at the government for wasting taxpayer money to set up these &quot;sting operations&quot; when they can&#039;t even find a real criminal (who is actively abusing children or pets or doing coke, whatever) to save their lives.  i wish the best for you and your family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello Dora,</p>
<p>something similar also happened to my father.  he looked at child pornography online after stumbling across it via other websites.  he himself was abused (by very *religious* grandparents i would add) as a child and due to this wanted to hassle people that distributed the pictures he had seen.  he went into a chatroom and pretended to be someone else and offered to meet up with an FBI agent (who was also pretending to be someone else).  he did so, he says, to inconvenience the man because it was a 4 hour drive for the FBI agent and 2 hours for my dad (to the agreed upon location).  he stood the guy up (obviously), but a few weeks later, he was arrested for owning illegal pictures of a minor engaged in sexual activity.  as with your situation, my father never abused me when i was a child.</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t want to alarm you anymore than i&#8217;m sure you already are, but my dad did receive 5 years in federal prison.  my father was also in his late 50s when he was arrested.  i fluctuate between being so angry at him for being that dumb and also angry at the government for wasting taxpayer money to set up these &#8220;sting operations&#8221; when they can&#8217;t even find a real criminal (who is actively abusing children or pets or doing coke, whatever) to save their lives.  i wish the best for you and your family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dora</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12173</link>
		<dc:creator>Dora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12173</guid>
		<description>My father has been accused of internet child pornography by Homeland Security and is now in jail facing a federal sentencing of 5 years.  This man is a good person, very passive, was married to a manipulative women since 1990 who separated him from his family, had a child with him and has been using this child ever since as blackmail against him, she divorced him around 2001 and married another man.  He still had no control of his finances and was handing over his whole retirement to the ex-wife, so he was in a dire financial state, and being told he would be able to see the &quot;baby&quot; unless he forked out the money.  So basically has been through a lot of trauma, has suffered epileptic seizures these past few years and memory loss.  He served in the Vietnam War and was just getting ready to start receiving his disability and veterans benefits.  About a year after he returned from the war and married my mother he  was diagnosed with diabetes which contributes to the above said medical condition.  I am just getting back in contact with my dad and I feel like there is something wrong with this picture.  I&#039;m trying to put the pieces together.  He has admitted guilt, but it still doesn&#039;t feel right for this 59 year old battered and broken man to be put in jail for 5 years!!!!  My mother was married to him for 11 years and their divorce was for her reasons at the time, but they have come to be friends now and she vouches for his being a caring man and that the picture being presented in black and white on the case file is not the man that she knows my dad to be.  I myself am a victim of child sexual abuse, but not by my father he has always been a kind and loving dad to me.  My dad told me very simply that he got addicted to internet porn and that led to the child porn because he was curious when it popped up.  The internet creates a strange fantastical virtual reality environment and I do not feel that my father should be put in jail for 5 years for being curious and engaging in looking at images online.  He is not a predator and has not done any harm to anyone.  For him now to have to be labeled a sex offender and possibly not be able to see his own grandchildren seems a little excessive to me, let alone the danger of him being in jail with actual criminals.  I would like to know what is being done to shut down the real predators and people that are putting these images out there in the first place, those are the predators.  This is creating an extremely sensitive legal environment involving our personal freedom.  It has gone this far for me that I am ready to stand up and do something about it, my dad&#039;s hearing is on November 28th.  I&#039;m hoping that you will offer up all your objective comments, pro, con, positive, negative to help me get a handle on this situation.  I appreciate your time!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My father has been accused of internet child pornography by Homeland Security and is now in jail facing a federal sentencing of 5 years.  This man is a good person, very passive, was married to a manipulative women since 1990 who separated him from his family, had a child with him and has been using this child ever since as blackmail against him, she divorced him around 2001 and married another man.  He still had no control of his finances and was handing over his whole retirement to the ex-wife, so he was in a dire financial state, and being told he would be able to see the &#8220;baby&#8221; unless he forked out the money.  So basically has been through a lot of trauma, has suffered epileptic seizures these past few years and memory loss.  He served in the Vietnam War and was just getting ready to start receiving his disability and veterans benefits.  About a year after he returned from the war and married my mother he  was diagnosed with diabetes which contributes to the above said medical condition.  I am just getting back in contact with my dad and I feel like there is something wrong with this picture.  I&#8217;m trying to put the pieces together.  He has admitted guilt, but it still doesn&#8217;t feel right for this 59 year old battered and broken man to be put in jail for 5 years!!!!  My mother was married to him for 11 years and their divorce was for her reasons at the time, but they have come to be friends now and she vouches for his being a caring man and that the picture being presented in black and white on the case file is not the man that she knows my dad to be.  I myself am a victim of child sexual abuse, but not by my father he has always been a kind and loving dad to me.  My dad told me very simply that he got addicted to internet porn and that led to the child porn because he was curious when it popped up.  The internet creates a strange fantastical virtual reality environment and I do not feel that my father should be put in jail for 5 years for being curious and engaging in looking at images online.  He is not a predator and has not done any harm to anyone.  For him now to have to be labeled a sex offender and possibly not be able to see his own grandchildren seems a little excessive to me, let alone the danger of him being in jail with actual criminals.  I would like to know what is being done to shut down the real predators and people that are putting these images out there in the first place, those are the predators.  This is creating an extremely sensitive legal environment involving our personal freedom.  It has gone this far for me that I am ready to stand up and do something about it, my dad&#8217;s hearing is on November 28th.  I&#8217;m hoping that you will offer up all your objective comments, pro, con, positive, negative to help me get a handle on this situation.  I appreciate your time!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12172</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 02:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12172</guid>
		<description>intrapment!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>intrapment!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia Kay</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12171</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 06:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12171</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I actually knew Brian many years ago when he was at TIME magazine (I was just beginning my writing career), and he was the nicest man in the world... sort of brotherly, extremely helpful and had a great personality. If asked, I would describe him as a very good person, and a loyal friend.

Of course, learning of all that has happened is upsetting (to say the least).  People can judge, but he is obviously someone who needs help.  At the risk of having everyone on this site slam me, I am going to keep him and his family in my thoughts/prayers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I actually knew Brian many years ago when he was at TIME magazine (I was just beginning my writing career), and he was the nicest man in the world&#8230; sort of brotherly, extremely helpful and had a great personality. If asked, I would describe him as a very good person, and a loyal friend.</p>
<p>Of course, learning of all that has happened is upsetting (to say the least).  People can judge, but he is obviously someone who needs help.  At the risk of having everyone on this site slam me, I am going to keep him and his family in my thoughts/prayers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLOGical Thoughts &#187; Monday, 20 November, 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12170</link>
		<dc:creator>BLOGical Thoughts &#187; Monday, 20 November, 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 18:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12170</guid>
		<description>[...] Former Homeland Security press aide sentenced to prison [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Former Homeland Security press aide sentenced to prison [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12169</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12169</guid>
		<description>A couple of key facts to this case that were not mentioned in the
article or subsequent posts. Doyle sent sexually explicit pictures of
himself to someone he thought was a minor. Investigators found child
porn on Doyle&#039;s personal computer. Doyle used government computers to
send sexual explicit comments to the &quot;girl&quot;. Doyle held a top secret
government security clearance and his reprehensible actions were not
only a violation of his clearance but they could have been used by a
terrorist to blackmail him. All things considered, I&#039;d say he got off
pretty easy with a 5 year sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of key facts to this case that were not mentioned in the<br />
article or subsequent posts. Doyle sent sexually explicit pictures of<br />
himself to someone he thought was a minor. Investigators found child<br />
porn on Doyle&#8217;s personal computer. Doyle used government computers to<br />
send sexual explicit comments to the &#8220;girl&#8221;. Doyle held a top secret<br />
government security clearance and his reprehensible actions were not<br />
only a violation of his clearance but they could have been used by a<br />
terrorist to blackmail him. All things considered, I&#8217;d say he got off<br />
pretty easy with a 5 year sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HonkyMoFo</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12168</link>
		<dc:creator>HonkyMoFo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12168</guid>
		<description>I knew that &#8220;lt&#8217;s for the children&#8221; would have to come out
here sooner or later. It&#8217;s as inevitable as death and taxes.

The key aspect here is that there was no victim. In the absence of a victim,
(even a societal victim) there is no crime. Had the police not fraudulently generated
a victim there is no evidence that Doyle would have actually had the opportunity
or disposition to commit this crime.

This is specifically different than a sting operation where the police receive
a tip about a man hiring a hit man, a man actually sending illicit e-mails to
a real 14-year old girl, or someone attempting to fence stolen goods or sell
dangerous contraband. In those cases there is clearly an actual victim or victims.

This case is similar to the famous attempt to entrap John DeLorean. DeLorean
wasn&#8217;t trying to sell any contraband. The police set up a sting to induce
DeLorean into buying drugs--drugs that actually didn&#8217;t exist. DeLorean
wasn&#8217;t looking to buy drugs, but the police used his dire financial situation
to create a crime for him that we would not otherwise have been disposed to seek
out. DeLorean was acquitted of all charges.

As to Doyle&#8217;s mental feelings of guilt, I can&#8217;t comment. People say
a lot of different things when they&#8217;re desperate and their entire
life is on the line. If I was facing a sentecing judge because some prosecutor
had stacked charges against me (based on a fraudulent police tactic) and forced
me into a plea deal, I&#8217;d
probably be acting pretty remorseful too. Doyle might even really feel guilty,
as he knew he shouldn&#039;t have been propositioning a 14 year old girl.

Except that he didn&#8217;t actually do that, did he?
He propositioned a police officer who posed as a 14-year old girl in an attempt
  to lure vulnerable men into doing something that they may have fantasized about,
  but might otherwise have never had the opportunity to do. The key word there
  is opportunity. It&#8217;s not illegal to fantasize about crime. Had the police
  not fraudulently created a crime it&#8217;s not only possible, but statistically
  unlikely, that Doyle would have actually had the opportunity to find a willing
  and encouraging victim. There is no evidence that he actually ever chatted
  or e-mailed  a real underage female. In fact, at one point he gets confused
  as to who he&#8217;s conversing with because he&#8217;s speaking to another
  undercover officer posing as a teenager.

  One begins to wonder if there are any potential victims at all, or if the teen
  chat rooms of America are stocked full of either undercover police officers
or vigilantes like Perverted Justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew that &ldquo;lt&rsquo;s for the children&rdquo; would have to come out<br />
here sooner or later. It&rsquo;s as inevitable as death and taxes.</p>
<p>The key aspect here is that there was no victim. In the absence of a victim,<br />
(even a societal victim) there is no crime. Had the police not fraudulently generated<br />
a victim there is no evidence that Doyle would have actually had the opportunity<br />
or disposition to commit this crime.</p>
<p>This is specifically different than a sting operation where the police receive<br />
a tip about a man hiring a hit man, a man actually sending illicit e-mails to<br />
a real 14-year old girl, or someone attempting to fence stolen goods or sell<br />
dangerous contraband. In those cases there is clearly an actual victim or victims.</p>
<p>This case is similar to the famous attempt to entrap John DeLorean. DeLorean<br />
wasn&rsquo;t trying to sell any contraband. The police set up a sting to induce<br />
DeLorean into buying drugs&#8211;drugs that actually didn&rsquo;t exist. DeLorean<br />
wasn&rsquo;t looking to buy drugs, but the police used his dire financial situation<br />
to create a crime for him that we would not otherwise have been disposed to seek<br />
out. DeLorean was acquitted of all charges.</p>
<p>As to Doyle&rsquo;s mental feelings of guilt, I can&rsquo;t comment. People say<br />
a lot of different things when they&rsquo;re desperate and their entire<br />
life is on the line. If I was facing a sentecing judge because some prosecutor<br />
had stacked charges against me (based on a fraudulent police tactic) and forced<br />
me into a plea deal, I&rsquo;d<br />
probably be acting pretty remorseful too. Doyle might even really feel guilty,<br />
as he knew he shouldn&#8217;t have been propositioning a 14 year old girl.</p>
<p>Except that he didn&rsquo;t actually do that, did he?<br />
He propositioned a police officer who posed as a 14-year old girl in an attempt<br />
  to lure vulnerable men into doing something that they may have fantasized about,<br />
  but might otherwise have never had the opportunity to do. The key word there<br />
  is opportunity. It&rsquo;s not illegal to fantasize about crime. Had the police<br />
  not fraudulently created a crime it&rsquo;s not only possible, but statistically<br />
  unlikely, that Doyle would have actually had the opportunity to find a willing<br />
  and encouraging victim. There is no evidence that he actually ever chatted<br />
  or e-mailed  a real underage female. In fact, at one point he gets confused<br />
  as to who he&rsquo;s conversing with because he&rsquo;s speaking to another<br />
  undercover officer posing as a teenager.</p>
<p>  One begins to wonder if there are any potential victims at all, or if the teen<br />
  chat rooms of America are stocked full of either undercover police officers<br />
or vigilantes like Perverted Justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BelchSpeak</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12166</link>
		<dc:creator>BelchSpeak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/11/19/former-homeland-security-press-aide-sentenced-to-prison/#comment-12166</guid>
		<description>Hmmm....  nifty definitions.  You left one out-  &quot;Sting.&quot;
So I guess you want everyone nabbed in sting operations to go free?  Despite their lawful convictions by the judiciary?

He got caught in a sting operation, plain and simple.  Doyle didnt even protest!  He knew he was busted.  What&#039;s your problem with putting sex offenders behind bars?  You want molested children first?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;.  nifty definitions.  You left one out-  &#8220;Sting.&#8221;<br />
So I guess you want everyone nabbed in sting operations to go free?  Despite their lawful convictions by the judiciary?</p>
<p>He got caught in a sting operation, plain and simple.  Doyle didnt even protest!  He knew he was busted.  What&#8217;s your problem with putting sex offenders behind bars?  You want molested children first?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.079 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 17:04:06 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
