<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Military radios kill garage door openers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/</link>
	<description>Protect yourself from government gaffes, bureaucratic blunders and incumbent incompetence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wp</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-20913</link>
		<dc:creator>wp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 17:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-20913</guid>
		<description>i know that in microwave com you can adj freq,by cutting length and is not linnear cuts.deliquet oper. by tec. but what a garage door atena no.there is long range of transmission talk.for instance a coiled atenna for mobile can be clipped to adjust the ratio. 
To the person e&amp;w.it seems that shielding from e-w would be the intenerary. as N would effect both e-w by line of site. i have not studied said mentioned garage door opener. but i will and will reply back if necesary. there may not be an easy way to shield for every orientation. as i havent yet given this much thought what so ever.I just read this page today!not to mention no sleep and dont care about grammer at this time and not using an editor. i also havent researched iTrip. but i now if a person was using ham freq band,that they could be running a slinky. which if in conjested neighborhood it would be difficult2detect. unless you have xray.is worth the expence? well that&#039;s up to who ever. food for thought the coiled antena via transisteradio.point in derection of bar n-s. The lmr could be cell\radio or even low band technology. if so would not be problem. think about {space,water}- shore com in laymen terms and a 10mi person-person. one of u men 6mi n. i dont see that a problem.unless pumping a lot of power.why would you for 10mi ra. my quess is on the quarter.there is a unmentionable amount of brands and types new and old.How to acomidate all.only thing right now is shame on you. just like the pc industry.buy hardware then software and so on. there was really no need to bring race,as i could somewhat detect eng ger and color by the way of write.not to mention pyscology so happened peptimist and optimist combatting each other. also not mentioning a few working for the gov one time or another. another mirage to keep people off track.cant blind me.why is it technology seen of today is really techno created 40&#039;s-60&#039;s and so called green from 1850&#039;s.what would u do with a savings of 15&#039;000us over 30years,that is what it could cost u using your device. so called win7 not to get off track but has same problems as xt pc. every thing said and done,it all boils down to $&#039;s.when can the home user ever have the techno., that sould be in a pc! awnser never! It will most likely be kept from u.And has been for years. Still in a shell.i understand about security for the increpid .please dont take this personable,im just blunt .but remember too! security is false security.So dont live by fear but day x day,go out to smell the roses once in awile. Its not neccesary to get mad about anothers comments.and really just causes things to get off track.i&#039;m not sure if that was intentional or not.As to the mention of kissass i have no use for persons like that.And they are really useless.I experienced people like that.For example they couldn&#039;t TS a device.but yet have there bosses believing in them. In turn they brought the device to me and i found s-grnd.the device would actually work as long as it was not connected in actual circuit 2 grnd.So that&#039;s why i believe the way i do.i was trained in hertz but picked up the kc the persons talked about in this article.i usually like doing research before i talk.Excuse me but i to got cought up in the rederick. I&#039;m not apology. I stick to my guns per say.if i&#039;m right i&#039;m right and if not i say so.but not necesarily all the time to say so.there is more things to say but not before doing alot of research.I stongly believe that a device shows a problem and works.It is more likely to fail again then not. So lets find the bugger.i would put somewhat more trust for people in the vacume tube age, and find that they have more knowlege then people of to day.mostly because people of today relie on pc&#039;s to much for there brains.Secoundly my generation was caught in the middle so called changes,not good.save the changes for people that use it every hour.over engineering really saving things.KISS! i find new is not necesarily energy efficient. for example a old analog\mechanical vrs. {digital\electronics uses more amp}.The more u put in the more that goes wrong. Can our nation really afford this on the path were going.is this rome all over again.pretty close.I&#039;ve worked closely with u s a Ceo&#039;s &amp; listened to major share holders.I could name 1/2-dozen corps or what ever having china do production.If u can build it, u have the tecnology.dont listen to the statement (china is stilling our technology it is false). Your own country persons are doing it at least the 70&#039;s or before trying.just slave labor.Remember the reporter that was Xed from wall street. Watch out for distributors buy from them and put are nation out of work.It may be some day we will need our museums to get us back working as a nation under good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i know that in microwave com you can adj freq,by cutting length and is not linnear cuts.deliquet oper. by tec. but what a garage door atena no.there is long range of transmission talk.for instance a coiled atenna for mobile can be clipped to adjust the ratio.<br />
To the person e&amp;w.it seems that shielding from e-w would be the intenerary. as N would effect both e-w by line of site. i have not studied said mentioned garage door opener. but i will and will reply back if necesary. there may not be an easy way to shield for every orientation. as i havent yet given this much thought what so ever.I just read this page today!not to mention no sleep and dont care about grammer at this time and not using an editor. i also havent researched iTrip. but i now if a person was using ham freq band,that they could be running a slinky. which if in conjested neighborhood it would be difficult2detect. unless you have xray.is worth the expence? well that&#8217;s up to who ever. food for thought the coiled antena via transisteradio.point in derection of bar n-s. The lmr could be cell\radio or even low band technology. if so would not be problem. think about {space,water}- shore com in laymen terms and a 10mi person-person. one of u men 6mi n. i dont see that a problem.unless pumping a lot of power.why would you for 10mi ra. my quess is on the quarter.there is a unmentionable amount of brands and types new and old.How to acomidate all.only thing right now is shame on you. just like the pc industry.buy hardware then software and so on. there was really no need to bring race,as i could somewhat detect eng ger and color by the way of write.not to mention pyscology so happened peptimist and optimist combatting each other. also not mentioning a few working for the gov one time or another. another mirage to keep people off track.cant blind me.why is it technology seen of today is really techno created 40&#8242;s-60&#8242;s and so called green from 1850&#8242;s.what would u do with a savings of 15&#8217;000us over 30years,that is what it could cost u using your device. so called win7 not to get off track but has same problems as xt pc. every thing said and done,it all boils down to $&#8217;s.when can the home user ever have the techno., that sould be in a pc! awnser never! It will most likely be kept from u.And has been for years. Still in a shell.i understand about security for the increpid .please dont take this personable,im just blunt .but remember too! security is false security.So dont live by fear but day x day,go out to smell the roses once in awile. Its not neccesary to get mad about anothers comments.and really just causes things to get off track.i&#8217;m not sure if that was intentional or not.As to the mention of kissass i have no use for persons like that.And they are really useless.I experienced people like that.For example they couldn&#8217;t TS a device.but yet have there bosses believing in them. In turn they brought the device to me and i found s-grnd.the device would actually work as long as it was not connected in actual circuit 2 grnd.So that&#8217;s why i believe the way i do.i was trained in hertz but picked up the kc the persons talked about in this article.i usually like doing research before i talk.Excuse me but i to got cought up in the rederick. I&#8217;m not apology. I stick to my guns per say.if i&#8217;m right i&#8217;m right and if not i say so.but not necesarily all the time to say so.there is more things to say but not before doing alot of research.I stongly believe that a device shows a problem and works.It is more likely to fail again then not. So lets find the bugger.i would put somewhat more trust for people in the vacume tube age, and find that they have more knowlege then people of to day.mostly because people of today relie on pc&#8217;s to much for there brains.Secoundly my generation was caught in the middle so called changes,not good.save the changes for people that use it every hour.over engineering really saving things.KISS! i find new is not necesarily energy efficient. for example a old analog\mechanical vrs. {digital\electronics uses more amp}.The more u put in the more that goes wrong. Can our nation really afford this on the path were going.is this rome all over again.pretty close.I&#8217;ve worked closely with u s a Ceo&#8217;s &amp; listened to major share holders.I could name 1/2-dozen corps or what ever having china do production.If u can build it, u have the tecnology.dont listen to the statement (china is stilling our technology it is false). Your own country persons are doing it at least the 70&#8242;s or before trying.just slave labor.Remember the reporter that was Xed from wall street. Watch out for distributors buy from them and put are nation out of work.It may be some day we will need our museums to get us back working as a nation under good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JCMini30</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12369</link>
		<dc:creator>JCMini30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12369</guid>
		<description>I am a police officer. We have a analog radio system that will soon be updated.  I have opened electronic gates and garage doors when transmitting on my police radio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a police officer. We have a analog radio system that will soon be updated.  I have opened electronic gates and garage doors when transmitting on my police radio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynford</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12368</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 18:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12368</guid>
		<description>Highlander
When I take a good look at the future as best I can see it, I have to think that I&#039;m happy to have lived the years I lived.
There are entirely too many changes that don&#039;t represent real progress. When I was young and lived in either St. Louis or Los Angeles I could look down the alley behind whatever house I lived in and see young guys in their garages working on either cars, boats, maybe pin striping something, building radio control planes or tinkering with something electronic.
Today, you don&#039;t see them at all. They&#039;re all couch potatoes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Highlander<br />
When I take a good look at the future as best I can see it, I have to think that I&#8217;m happy to have lived the years I lived.<br />
There are entirely too many changes that don&#8217;t represent real progress. When I was young and lived in either St. Louis or Los Angeles I could look down the alley behind whatever house I lived in and see young guys in their garages working on either cars, boats, maybe pin striping something, building radio control planes or tinkering with something electronic.<br />
Today, you don&#8217;t see them at all. They&#8217;re all couch potatoes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Highlander</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12367</link>
		<dc:creator>Highlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 01:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12367</guid>
		<description>Lynford,

If I recall correctly, the change from x-cycles to x-hertz occurred in 1960 in memory of Heinrich Rudolf Hertz, the German physicist who did much research in electromagnetism.
However, I can distinctly recall that while serving on USS Saratoga (CVA-60), back in 1968, that in the Metrology/Calibration field we were still employing the term &#039;cycles,&#039; until a directive was issued to standardize to &#039;hertz.&#039;

While much of the world was in the process changing over, we (the USN) were getting new equipment with ID plates specifiying frequency in cycles (megacycles, kilomegacycles, etc.).
And it took a bit before all tech manuals were standardized to the new format.

In any case, I understand your relative resistance, because I too, had been trained to employ the term &#039;cycles,&#039; starting in 1955, and back then every radio was labeled with such on its frequency dial.

With regards to the current frequencies in use, this web site discusses it&#039;s garage door frequency bands;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynford,</p>
<p>If I recall correctly, the change from x-cycles to x-hertz occurred in 1960 in memory of Heinrich Rudolf Hertz, the German physicist who did much research in electromagnetism.<br />
However, I can distinctly recall that while serving on USS Saratoga (CVA-60), back in 1968, that in the Metrology/Calibration field we were still employing the term &#8216;cycles,&#8217; until a directive was issued to standardize to &#8216;hertz.&#8217;</p>
<p>While much of the world was in the process changing over, we (the USN) were getting new equipment with ID plates specifiying frequency in cycles (megacycles, kilomegacycles, etc.).<br />
And it took a bit before all tech manuals were standardized to the new format.</p>
<p>In any case, I understand your relative resistance, because I too, had been trained to employ the term &#8216;cycles,&#8217; starting in 1955, and back then every radio was labeled with such on its frequency dial.</p>
<p>With regards to the current frequencies in use, this web site discusses it&#8217;s garage door frequency bands;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynford</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12366</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 00:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12366</guid>
		<description>Hello Derf
I don&#039;t know what all frequencies are being used today but forty seven years ago I built transmitters and sold them using that freq. range. I think I remember it to be about 160mc to 210mc. I don&#039;t use hertz much because I think the change was stupid. Then of couse I&#039;m an old guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Derf<br />
I don&#8217;t know what all frequencies are being used today but forty seven years ago I built transmitters and sold them using that freq. range. I think I remember it to be about 160mc to 210mc. I don&#8217;t use hertz much because I think the change was stupid. Then of couse I&#8217;m an old guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derf</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12365</link>
		<dc:creator>Derf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12365</guid>
		<description>Dosnt anyone Know that the garage door freqs you seem to me talking about are allocated in the 160- 190 khz range ?
i.e. .16 - .19 mhz....  these are very long waves ??
Check out long wave club of America.

Just wondering

Derf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dosnt anyone Know that the garage door freqs you seem to me talking about are allocated in the 160- 190 khz range ?<br />
i.e. .16 &#8211; .19 mhz&#8230;.  these are very long waves ??<br />
Check out long wave club of America.</p>
<p>Just wondering</p>
<p>Derf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynford</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12364</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12364</guid>
		<description>Highlander
That&#039;s quite a story about the analyzer. It took a lot of effort but I suppose it&#039;s worth it.
My video system is a different brand, boast a few more goodies than some. It&#039;s been working well now for almost two years. There are several things about our security that I dare not talk about because here on the web and I&#039;ve used my real name, it would defeat most of the system. The video is only the beginning. The cameras are all hidden because they could easily be taken out with a pellet gun if the locations were known. The cameras are expensive for the most part, except for four of them. I have Missouri purple around the place, that&#039;s what you paint certain post or trees here in Missouri and if anybody trespasses and you catch-um they are in for first class misdemeanor. That&#039;s not all, if they do anything that might hurt you or property other things can happen. It depends on what illegal action they do and the severity. Any where you go it&#039;s hard to stay within the law and  still protect yourself and your valuables. You simply have to make a decision as to where the fine line is located and follow it carefully no matter what the stress of the moment is. That puts a lot of pressure on you and leaves holes for the bad guy to get away with his bullshit. The fine line in California is finer by far than it is here in Missouri. The fact that we&#039;re not in a town but on a farm like location gives greater advantages over that of a city dweller. We&#039;re not exposed to all the in-town slime. But still I must follow the proceedure laid out by my attorney so I don&#039;t screw up should a bad guy arrive. He empathized that should there be a problem be sure to call 911 before proceeding further.

We have deer, wild turkeys by the dozens here on our place and we treat them all as pets. When they go out on the roads the poachers blow them away. That&#039;s not my problem. I don&#039;t care for it but factually, it&#039;s none of my business.
In the spring and summer the turkeys come up near our dwelling and observe our cats. They stare at them and I suppose wonder what they are. We hear them outside making their sounds, Pert,Pert,Pert. It&#039;s a very mellow but penetrating sound. I think they too would like to be living with us.

Being that this is the country and I get up with the chickens it&#039;s now time for me to hit the sack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Highlander<br />
That&#8217;s quite a story about the analyzer. It took a lot of effort but I suppose it&#8217;s worth it.<br />
My video system is a different brand, boast a few more goodies than some. It&#8217;s been working well now for almost two years. There are several things about our security that I dare not talk about because here on the web and I&#8217;ve used my real name, it would defeat most of the system. The video is only the beginning. The cameras are all hidden because they could easily be taken out with a pellet gun if the locations were known. The cameras are expensive for the most part, except for four of them. I have Missouri purple around the place, that&#8217;s what you paint certain post or trees here in Missouri and if anybody trespasses and you catch-um they are in for first class misdemeanor. That&#8217;s not all, if they do anything that might hurt you or property other things can happen. It depends on what illegal action they do and the severity. Any where you go it&#8217;s hard to stay within the law and  still protect yourself and your valuables. You simply have to make a decision as to where the fine line is located and follow it carefully no matter what the stress of the moment is. That puts a lot of pressure on you and leaves holes for the bad guy to get away with his bullshit. The fine line in California is finer by far than it is here in Missouri. The fact that we&#8217;re not in a town but on a farm like location gives greater advantages over that of a city dweller. We&#8217;re not exposed to all the in-town slime. But still I must follow the proceedure laid out by my attorney so I don&#8217;t screw up should a bad guy arrive. He empathized that should there be a problem be sure to call 911 before proceeding further.</p>
<p>We have deer, wild turkeys by the dozens here on our place and we treat them all as pets. When they go out on the roads the poachers blow them away. That&#8217;s not my problem. I don&#8217;t care for it but factually, it&#8217;s none of my business.<br />
In the spring and summer the turkeys come up near our dwelling and observe our cats. They stare at them and I suppose wonder what they are. We hear them outside making their sounds, Pert,Pert,Pert. It&#8217;s a very mellow but penetrating sound. I think they too would like to be living with us.</p>
<p>Being that this is the country and I get up with the chickens it&#8217;s now time for me to hit the sack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Highlander</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12363</link>
		<dc:creator>Highlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 23:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12363</guid>
		<description>Lynford,

Quote:
&quot;The last spectrum analyzer I used was an HP, donâ€™t remember the model, but it wa a very good one. I was on the job of course in Irvine, California. Thats more than twenty five years ago.&quot;
Unquote.

That likely was a Model 141T.
See this:

When I was in the USN, I worked in Metrology/Calibration. That was the very best field to be in, because you got to work on everything instead of specializing on just one or two systems. Heck, I even repaired the occasional optical borescope, and several night vision devices!

I can&#039;t begin to tell you how many spectrum analyzers â€“ of whatever make and model â€“ I repaired and calbrated.
The very first one I got to work on was an SA80, and it was heavy enough that it required two men to move it, and even then it was difficult.

And yes, cameras! You might be advised though that there are detectors out there, and one of the best is this:

There is a philosophy regarding having both visible and hidden cameras, versus just one or the other. What you can&#039;t see, you can&#039;t know about; what you can see makes you aware. Most burglars are petty people, and afraid of being caught. Seeing an obvious camera sends them packing.
It&#039;s like having a radio turned on and playing: Is someone home, or not? If you can&#039;t see in, then you are blind to the fact.

Now, let me relate to you an incident that happened to me about a year ago.
One day, a car backed into my driveway from the cul-de-sac (this is unusual in itself, as who backs into a 150 foot driveway?), two young men (early 20&#039;s â€“ if that)
got out of the car, and one of them stood by the garage door in plain sight of the front door, while the other went around to the east side of the garage, and upon seeing one of the cameras, spray-painted the window at the farthest (quickly visible) camera and then saw the nearest camera (the one closest to him) and took off running back to the car, whereupon they quickly drove away. They haven&#039;t been back since.

Window cameras should always be placed aiming in the direction of the opposite camera to get a cross field view such that the approach covers both directions and the near field at the same time.

And a decal on window that says &#039;This house protected by Smith &amp; Wesson&#039; doesn&#039;t hurt either!

Any strange vehicle that backs into a driveway is the first telltale sign of something amiss.

Now, I called the cops, but they never came by, and didn&#039;t even want to talk about the video clips from the few cameras that caught their actions.
Apparently, someone entering upon your property and spray painting windows is considered such a paltry offence, that it&#039;s not even worth investigating.

Sometime ago, I purchased a Day-Night surveillance camera that advertised as having IR illumination, however the bugger used 800nm range LEDs, and those are visible. So, I went an found some 700nm range (not visible) LEDs, and swapped them out.
It works even better, as there is all the more IR is being generated where it needs to be, rather than in the visible light spectrum.

Now, all of this really good, but if there is prowler out and about who&#039;s wearing a ski mask, the cameras won&#039;t do much, and alarms that don&#039;t awaken neighbors are less than useless.
I given thought to a project that uses millimeter radiation (close to the range used by airport security to see under clothing) in order to see past the mask. Most of the tech is off-the-shelf stuff.
And then there is the thought of using something in the ultrasonic range ...

My particular system used a two-level alert: First an internal warning is generated, with a less than one minute delay before the outside alarms get activated. This delay gives me time reset the alarm, and check out the situation if I&#039;m home.

I&#039;ve had a few false alarms caused by animals, and being woken from a dead sleep is as about as frightening a thing as any! It&#039;s good drill though, for it helps prepare you for the real thing. The first time you get woken, you&#039;re a bundle of nerves shaking almost uncontrollably!
But then the old miltary training kicks in, and you develop an almost automatic protocol of preparation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynford,</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
&#8220;The last spectrum analyzer I used was an HP, donâ€™t remember the model, but it wa a very good one. I was on the job of course in Irvine, California. Thats more than twenty five years ago.&#8221;<br />
Unquote.</p>
<p>That likely was a Model 141T.<br />
See this:</p>
<p>When I was in the USN, I worked in Metrology/Calibration. That was the very best field to be in, because you got to work on everything instead of specializing on just one or two systems. Heck, I even repaired the occasional optical borescope, and several night vision devices!</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t begin to tell you how many spectrum analyzers â€“ of whatever make and model â€“ I repaired and calbrated.<br />
The very first one I got to work on was an SA80, and it was heavy enough that it required two men to move it, and even then it was difficult.</p>
<p>And yes, cameras! You might be advised though that there are detectors out there, and one of the best is this:</p>
<p>There is a philosophy regarding having both visible and hidden cameras, versus just one or the other. What you can&#8217;t see, you can&#8217;t know about; what you can see makes you aware. Most burglars are petty people, and afraid of being caught. Seeing an obvious camera sends them packing.<br />
It&#8217;s like having a radio turned on and playing: Is someone home, or not? If you can&#8217;t see in, then you are blind to the fact.</p>
<p>Now, let me relate to you an incident that happened to me about a year ago.<br />
One day, a car backed into my driveway from the cul-de-sac (this is unusual in itself, as who backs into a 150 foot driveway?), two young men (early 20&#8242;s â€“ if that)<br />
got out of the car, and one of them stood by the garage door in plain sight of the front door, while the other went around to the east side of the garage, and upon seeing one of the cameras, spray-painted the window at the farthest (quickly visible) camera and then saw the nearest camera (the one closest to him) and took off running back to the car, whereupon they quickly drove away. They haven&#8217;t been back since.</p>
<p>Window cameras should always be placed aiming in the direction of the opposite camera to get a cross field view such that the approach covers both directions and the near field at the same time.</p>
<p>And a decal on window that says &#8216;This house protected by Smith &amp; Wesson&#8217; doesn&#8217;t hurt either!</p>
<p>Any strange vehicle that backs into a driveway is the first telltale sign of something amiss.</p>
<p>Now, I called the cops, but they never came by, and didn&#8217;t even want to talk about the video clips from the few cameras that caught their actions.<br />
Apparently, someone entering upon your property and spray painting windows is considered such a paltry offence, that it&#8217;s not even worth investigating.</p>
<p>Sometime ago, I purchased a Day-Night surveillance camera that advertised as having IR illumination, however the bugger used 800nm range LEDs, and those are visible. So, I went an found some 700nm range (not visible) LEDs, and swapped them out.<br />
It works even better, as there is all the more IR is being generated where it needs to be, rather than in the visible light spectrum.</p>
<p>Now, all of this really good, but if there is prowler out and about who&#8217;s wearing a ski mask, the cameras won&#8217;t do much, and alarms that don&#8217;t awaken neighbors are less than useless.<br />
I given thought to a project that uses millimeter radiation (close to the range used by airport security to see under clothing) in order to see past the mask. Most of the tech is off-the-shelf stuff.<br />
And then there is the thought of using something in the ultrasonic range &#8230;</p>
<p>My particular system used a two-level alert: First an internal warning is generated, with a less than one minute delay before the outside alarms get activated. This delay gives me time reset the alarm, and check out the situation if I&#8217;m home.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had a few false alarms caused by animals, and being woken from a dead sleep is as about as frightening a thing as any! It&#8217;s good drill though, for it helps prepare you for the real thing. The first time you get woken, you&#8217;re a bundle of nerves shaking almost uncontrollably!<br />
But then the old miltary training kicks in, and you develop an almost automatic protocol of preparation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynford</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12362</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12362</guid>
		<description>Highlander
I agree with your comments on how rotten some of the folks are these days. Of course modern equipment makes things very convenient for those dudes. It&#039;s a big laugh to them to steal and sell for a few nickels what somebody has put many hours of work into buying for themselves. Another type of thief is the one who says he has more use for whatever he steals than the previous owner did. Therefore he feels justified in taking it.

The last spectrum analyzer I used was an HP, don&#039;t remember the model, but it wa a very good one. I was on the job of course in Irvine, California. Thats more than twenty five years ago.

I&#039;ve got some fair pieces of equipment, old, but they work. Nothing in the high frequency area though.

Actually, if somebody opened my garage door in any manner they&#039;d find a tractor, some garden tools and my old Yamaha bike. That&#039;s because it&#039;s in a barn. All insured of course.

Iv&#039;e also got a modern video alarm system with several cameras in hidden places. Much better than a dog barking all the time. When the alarm goes off the recorder starts to record. It works well both day and night. I never have an unannounced guest.

One thing about people like us is that we work with electronics because we like it. And when we are no longer employed we still like to tinker, that&#039;s me.

Wife is calling me to dinner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Highlander<br />
I agree with your comments on how rotten some of the folks are these days. Of course modern equipment makes things very convenient for those dudes. It&#8217;s a big laugh to them to steal and sell for a few nickels what somebody has put many hours of work into buying for themselves. Another type of thief is the one who says he has more use for whatever he steals than the previous owner did. Therefore he feels justified in taking it.</p>
<p>The last spectrum analyzer I used was an HP, don&#8217;t remember the model, but it wa a very good one. I was on the job of course in Irvine, California. Thats more than twenty five years ago.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got some fair pieces of equipment, old, but they work. Nothing in the high frequency area though.</p>
<p>Actually, if somebody opened my garage door in any manner they&#8217;d find a tractor, some garden tools and my old Yamaha bike. That&#8217;s because it&#8217;s in a barn. All insured of course.</p>
<p>Iv&#8217;e also got a modern video alarm system with several cameras in hidden places. Much better than a dog barking all the time. When the alarm goes off the recorder starts to record. It works well both day and night. I never have an unannounced guest.</p>
<p>One thing about people like us is that we work with electronics because we like it. And when we are no longer employed we still like to tinker, that&#8217;s me.</p>
<p>Wife is calling me to dinner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Highlander</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12361</link>
		<dc:creator>Highlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 05:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/12/03/military-radios-kill-garage-door-openers/#comment-12361</guid>
		<description>Lynford,

Good points all around.
However ...

What with computer hackers (the bad kind) seeking to access every machine they might â€“ and very often succeeding â€“ one should not make any assumption regarding who else might not possess sufficient knowledge of the design of one&#039;s security system.
Remember: If you can think about it, likely someone else has also.

When I consider security systems (I possess a fair level of knowlege of the field), the thing I think of most is: WHAT IF?

I will hand it to you that you&#039;re likely correct in that no one else in your vicinity â€“ today - would possess the knowledge of your final design.
But, consider the others that read our words here.
Technology doesn&#039;t stand still, and you already knew that.

Spectrum analyzers (of whatever sort) and data analyzers are becoming rather inexpensive on the second hand market. Go check ebay for good examples!
When you and I were kids, the simplest of test equipment cost darned near an arm and a leg. I still have an old Archer vacuum tube based VOM, from back in the early 1960&#039;s, and a Heathkit spectrum analyzer (built from a kit â€“ 1965), both of which I worked months to save up for!
Today, those items are considered useless junk â€“ but they still work.

I mention this for the reason that there are some really smart, really savvy, and really crooked kids on the block these days. Nothing pleases them more than to get over on other people. I don&#039;t know why that is, as such a psychology certainly didn&#039;t exist when I was a kid, at least not where I grew up.

And finally, I also understand that if someone really =really= wants access to your house bad enough, a garage door won&#039;t even stop them.
Bottom line: The happy medium is to make the lock as &#039;unpickable&#039; as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynford,</p>
<p>Good points all around.<br />
However &#8230;</p>
<p>What with computer hackers (the bad kind) seeking to access every machine they might â€“ and very often succeeding â€“ one should not make any assumption regarding who else might not possess sufficient knowledge of the design of one&#8217;s security system.<br />
Remember: If you can think about it, likely someone else has also.</p>
<p>When I consider security systems (I possess a fair level of knowlege of the field), the thing I think of most is: WHAT IF?</p>
<p>I will hand it to you that you&#8217;re likely correct in that no one else in your vicinity â€“ today &#8211; would possess the knowledge of your final design.<br />
But, consider the others that read our words here.<br />
Technology doesn&#8217;t stand still, and you already knew that.</p>
<p>Spectrum analyzers (of whatever sort) and data analyzers are becoming rather inexpensive on the second hand market. Go check ebay for good examples!<br />
When you and I were kids, the simplest of test equipment cost darned near an arm and a leg. I still have an old Archer vacuum tube based VOM, from back in the early 1960&#8242;s, and a Heathkit spectrum analyzer (built from a kit â€“ 1965), both of which I worked months to save up for!<br />
Today, those items are considered useless junk â€“ but they still work.</p>
<p>I mention this for the reason that there are some really smart, really savvy, and really crooked kids on the block these days. Nothing pleases them more than to get over on other people. I don&#8217;t know why that is, as such a psychology certainly didn&#8217;t exist when I was a kid, at least not where I grew up.</p>
<p>And finally, I also understand that if someone really =really= wants access to your house bad enough, a garage door won&#8217;t even stop them.<br />
Bottom line: The happy medium is to make the lock as &#8216;unpickable&#8217; as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.116 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 13:31:13 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
