<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DHS wants local, state officials in the dark on threats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/02/03/dhs-wants-local-state-officials-in-the-dark-on-threats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/02/03/dhs-wants-local-state-officials-in-the-dark-on-threats/</link>
	<description>Protect yourself from government gaffes, bureaucratic blunders and incumbent incompetence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four potential risks to intelligence fusion centers - Homeland Stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/02/03/dhs-wants-local-state-officials-in-the-dark-on-threats/#comment-13523</link>
		<dc:creator>Four potential risks to intelligence fusion centers - Homeland Stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/02/03/dhs-wants-local-state-officials-in-the-dark-on-threats/#comment-13523</guid>
		<description>[...] of information from federal agencies, they never seem to get the &#8216;right information&#8217; or receive it in an efficient manner.&#8221; The fusion centers are further hampered by the way they are structured, according to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of information from federal agencies, they never seem to get the &#8216;right information&#8217; or receive it in an efficient manner.&#8221; The fusion centers are further hampered by the way they are structured, according to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHS will share threat information after all - Homeland Stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/02/03/dhs-wants-local-state-officials-in-the-dark-on-threats/#comment-13522</link>
		<dc:creator>DHS will share threat information after all - Homeland Stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/02/03/dhs-wants-local-state-officials-in-the-dark-on-threats/#comment-13522</guid>
		<description>[...] DHS had previously objected to having state and local participants in a group meant to send them relevant and useful threat information, saying it would cause &#8220;unnecessary confusion.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DHS had previously objected to having state and local participants in a group meant to send them relevant and useful threat information, saying it would cause &#8220;unnecessary confusion.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLOGical Thoughts &#187; Monday, 5 February, 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/02/03/dhs-wants-local-state-officials-in-the-dark-on-threats/#comment-13521</link>
		<dc:creator>BLOGical Thoughts &#187; Monday, 5 February, 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/02/03/dhs-wants-local-state-officials-in-the-dark-on-threats/#comment-13521</guid>
		<description>[...] DHS wants local, state officials in the dark on threats [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DHS wants local, state officials in the dark on threats [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/02/03/dhs-wants-local-state-officials-in-the-dark-on-threats/#comment-13520</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/02/03/dhs-wants-local-state-officials-in-the-dark-on-threats/#comment-13520</guid>
		<description>If DHS wants to learn how to do &quot;inter-governmental cooperation&quot; right, they ned look no further than the National Weather Service.

As Chair of a Board of Selectmen in a northeast community during the Blizzard of 1993, I can attest to the Weather Service&#039;s professionlism and information-sharing mentality.  The local weather bureau called EACH COMMUNITY, including my little 2000-person town, to alert them of a coference call briefing on the coming storm and its potential effects.  They had the Senior elected official&#039;s phone number AT HOME.  (I know - they called me!)

During the call, they had the electric company, phone company, state departments of transportation and state police contacts on the phone, ready to answer questions.

During the storm, I had a SKYWARN spotter assigned to the emergency operations center (better known as &quot;the fire station&quot;)  to relay real-time information from the NWS.

All in all, it was a tour-de-force of effective national support.  I KNEW long before the storm started that I should &quot;not expect State help for 24-48 hours, and not expect Federal help for a week.&quot;.  But I also knew well in advance what was coming, and - despite losing power to my rural town for three days - had no loss of life, and no major incidents or issues.

So - when it comes to the Feds, whom I often loathe for their incompetence and stovepiping, I say &quot;Let the Weather Service do it!!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If DHS wants to learn how to do &#8220;inter-governmental cooperation&#8221; right, they ned look no further than the National Weather Service.</p>
<p>As Chair of a Board of Selectmen in a northeast community during the Blizzard of 1993, I can attest to the Weather Service&#8217;s professionlism and information-sharing mentality.  The local weather bureau called EACH COMMUNITY, including my little 2000-person town, to alert them of a coference call briefing on the coming storm and its potential effects.  They had the Senior elected official&#8217;s phone number AT HOME.  (I know &#8211; they called me!)</p>
<p>During the call, they had the electric company, phone company, state departments of transportation and state police contacts on the phone, ready to answer questions.</p>
<p>During the storm, I had a SKYWARN spotter assigned to the emergency operations center (better known as &#8220;the fire station&#8221;)  to relay real-time information from the NWS.</p>
<p>All in all, it was a tour-de-force of effective national support.  I KNEW long before the storm started that I should &#8220;not expect State help for 24-48 hours, and not expect Federal help for a week.&#8221;.  But I also knew well in advance what was coming, and &#8211; despite losing power to my rural town for three days &#8211; had no loss of life, and no major incidents or issues.</p>
<p>So &#8211; when it comes to the Feds, whom I often loathe for their incompetence and stovepiping, I say &#8220;Let the Weather Service do it!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernarda</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/02/03/dhs-wants-local-state-officials-in-the-dark-on-threats/#comment-13519</link>
		<dc:creator>bernarda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 10:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/02/03/dhs-wants-local-state-officials-in-the-dark-on-threats/#comment-13519</guid>
		<description>The federal government has higher priorities. More death sentences for federal crimes, even in states that don&#039;t have the death penalty. From the WSJ.

http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117047411173597172-2el1QRyn4eonArFvLSrezcF1wFU_20080203.html?mod=blogs

&quot;Congress in 1986 began expanding federal jurisdiction to crimes that traditionally had been prosecuted by states -- imposing mandatory minimum sentences in crack cocaine cases, for example -- and two years later expanded federal reach into capital cases. Still, it took 14 years before federal prosecutors under then-Attorney General John Ashcroft managed to obtain capital convictions in jurisdictions that didn&#039;t have the death penalty at the local level.

In many cases, the Justice Department has asserted jurisdiction even though local prosecutors were prepared to handle the cases. In Puerto Rico, for example, federal prosecutors have unsuccessfully sought death sentences for four defendants since 2003 although Puerto Rico&#039;s constitution explicitly states that &quot;The death penalty shall not exist.&quot;

Puerto Rico&#039;s Secretary of Justice at the time, Anabelle Rodriguez, said her department&#039;s only recourse was to try to negotiate with the federal government to make it &quot;respect local idiosyncrasy&quot; so a death sentence wouldn&#039;t be enforced.

The rising count on federal death row comes as many states reconsider the death penalty or issue moratoriums on the punishment for a variety of reasons, including sloppy executions and exonerations of condemned inmates because of DNA evidence.

Since the 1988 reinstatement of the federal death penalty, prosecutors have attempted to bring capital cases in federal courts across the country. Typically, this has proved much easier in states such as Texas, which have death penalties of their own, than in states such as Iowa, which don&#039;t. In 2000, there were 18 inmates on federal death row, but none were from a state that disallows capital punishment.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal government has higher priorities. More death sentences for federal crimes, even in states that don&#8217;t have the death penalty. From the WSJ.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117047411173597172-2el1QRyn4eonArFvLSrezcF1wFU_20080203.html?mod=blogs" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117047411173597172-2el1QRyn4eonArFvLSrezcF1wFU_20080203.html?mod=blogs</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Congress in 1986 began expanding federal jurisdiction to crimes that traditionally had been prosecuted by states &#8212; imposing mandatory minimum sentences in crack cocaine cases, for example &#8212; and two years later expanded federal reach into capital cases. Still, it took 14 years before federal prosecutors under then-Attorney General John Ashcroft managed to obtain capital convictions in jurisdictions that didn&#8217;t have the death penalty at the local level.</p>
<p>In many cases, the Justice Department has asserted jurisdiction even though local prosecutors were prepared to handle the cases. In Puerto Rico, for example, federal prosecutors have unsuccessfully sought death sentences for four defendants since 2003 although Puerto Rico&#8217;s constitution explicitly states that &#8220;The death penalty shall not exist.&#8221;</p>
<p>Puerto Rico&#8217;s Secretary of Justice at the time, Anabelle Rodriguez, said her department&#8217;s only recourse was to try to negotiate with the federal government to make it &#8220;respect local idiosyncrasy&#8221; so a death sentence wouldn&#8217;t be enforced.</p>
<p>The rising count on federal death row comes as many states reconsider the death penalty or issue moratoriums on the punishment for a variety of reasons, including sloppy executions and exonerations of condemned inmates because of DNA evidence.</p>
<p>Since the 1988 reinstatement of the federal death penalty, prosecutors have attempted to bring capital cases in federal courts across the country. Typically, this has proved much easier in states such as Texas, which have death penalties of their own, than in states such as Iowa, which don&#8217;t. In 2000, there were 18 inmates on federal death row, but none were from a state that disallows capital punishment.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.065 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 16:58:17 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
