TSA misses liquid explosives, weapons in tests

April 4, 2007 @ 8 Comments

The Transportation Security Administration is supposed to be interdicting, among other things, liquid explosives, before someone manages to smuggle them aboard an aircraft and blow it up in a highly implausible movie-plot threat. Instead, they’ve been seizing and throwing away your bottled water and soda. So it shouldn’t be any surprise that TSA screeners at Denver International Airport failed to find 90% of weapons and explosives during recent tests.

In testing conducted by TSA’s Red Team, which attempts to “think like terrorists” and breach security, the TSA once again failed almost every test. And to add insult to injury, when the test results were leaked to a local news organization, bureaucrats said, well, the TSA isn’t supposed to pass every test and find everything.

I am not kidding. They really are taking your bottled water, knowing they expect to let some actual liquid explosives slip by.

The local NBC affiliate has all the details, including how one Red Team member carried an IED strapped to her body right through the metal detector. A short sample follows:

“If they miss something that’s obvious, often times that could happen, we will pull them off the line and retrain them,” said Security Director Earl Morris at TSA headquarters in Washington, D.C. “That’s how we audit and keep track of which people are doing a better job than others and how we keep this whole process so that it really is one that’s legitimate and factual and actually is effective.”

“There’s very little substance to security,” said former Red Team leader Bogdan Dzakovic. “It literally is all window dressing that we’re doing. It’s big theater on TV and when you go to the airport. It’s just security theater.”

Dzakovic was a Red Team leader from 1995 until September 11, 2001. After the terrorist attacks, Dzakovic became a federally protected whistleblower and alleged that thousands of people died needlessly. He testified before the 9/11 Commission and the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the US that the Red Team “breached security with ridiculous ease up to 90 percent of the time,” and said the FAA “knew how vulnerable aviation security was.”

Dzakovic, who is currently a TSA inspector, said security is no better today.

“It’s worse now. The terrorists can pretty much do what they want when they want to do it,” he said.

TSA’s Morris disagrees with that.

“We have a very robust program of which we are very proud, in which we utilize testing at all of our airports every single day,” said Morris.

The security chief says he expects screeners to fail the Red Team tests because they are difficult.

“We could put these tests together so that we have a 100 percent success rate every single time,” said Morris. “Then, they wouldn’t be challenging, they wouldn’t be realistic and they really wouldn’t be stretching the limits and the imagination of the Transportation Security Officer.”

Morris says the tests are designed to be tough so that officers can learn from their mistakes and successes.

“It’s a test but it’s also a learning experience,” said Morris. “It’s a constant audit that we put on there to see where our employees are and where we need to enhance the weaknesses.” — KUSA-TV

Yes, but do you expect screeners to fail 90% of the tests? Read the whole thing to learn the depths of insanity to which airport security has plunged, as if you didn’t already know.

Red Team tests at Newark Liberty International Airport a few months ago found pretty much the same thing. As did a classified Government Accountability Office investigation of 21 airports a year ago.

This is, of course, not news. Passenger screening has always been fairly pointless, even before 9/11, when the Red Team succeeded about 90% of the time, the same as now. Only back then, airport security was run by private companies. Of course, as we know now, the problem then wasn’t so much the private companies as the government cover-ups — which, not surprisingly, continue today, even after airport security has been nationalized.

At least before we got Hugo Chavez-style airport security, they were friendly and helpful. Find a friendly and helpful TSA screener, and you’re looking at someone who’s probably not going to be in government work very long.

It bears repeating until people understand it: If you want real security, you won’t get it as long as the government is involved.

(Hat tip: Annie Jacobsen)

8 Comments → “TSA misses liquid explosives, weapons in tests”

  1. Apr 04, 2007


  2. John

    Apr 09, 2007

    Doesn’t surprise ME in the least. I am a TSA screener. Management AND the PAX do not want security. The PAX whine if you are not subservient and take their knives away. Management is more worried about public relations and kissing xxx then protecting the public. Management’s focus since 9/12 has been “numbers are equal to previous numbers” and “tracking wait times”. We wouldn’t want the PAX to have to WAIT a few minutes. Security may well be worse now than PRE 9/11. But hey! just so people are smiling and pleasant, that is what we REALLY want, a “pleasant” trip, right up until the side of the plane rips open. TSA is a Ptomkin Village to protect………the AIRLINE INDUSTRY. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


  3. ReallyEvilCanine

    Apr 11, 2007

    John,

    People want security. What they’re sick of is not only the security theatre but also the total dehumanizing experience that is today’s screening. It’s pointless, it’s stupid, it humiliating, and it doesn’t provide even the slightest addition to the security of 30 years ago walking through the metal detectors.

    Not a single intrusion performed today would’ve stopped 9/11. Not one. Even without the boxcutters the terrorists had learned martial arts and improvising weapons on-board is easy. The only way to make flights totally safe is to strip the pax naked, X-ray them with a dose that would prevent them flying more than twice a year, and chain them down in the manner of the nineteenth century slave ships.

    The first thing they took away from us in boot camp (in 1982) was our matches. Lighters were OK since you have to be wherever the lighter is to start a fire. Not so with matches. You don’t even have to join the military to know this; it was a realistic plot device in Stalag 17. When I pointed this out to the TSA guy who’d said he’d been a Marine as he demanded I give up my lighter, I ended up nearly missing my flight as I was subjected to interrogation first by the police, then the FBI.

    I wrote about one experience I had in . To save you the trouble of clicking, this was the dialog at JFK in December:

    TSA: You can’t take these liquids with you.
    REC: They’re each under 100ml and all in the bag.
    TSA: You can’t take them. They’re drinkable.
    REC: And they were drinkable when I got on in Munich and in London. I’m not even flying internationally. They’re sealed cans provided by the airline! Look at the BA logo!
    TSA: And I’m telling you that you can’t take them to Florida.
    REC: But I can buy the same stuff again right there ten feet away!
    TSA: Exactly. You have to buy them here.
    REC: So this has nothing to do with ‘security’ and everything to do with revenue generation?
    TSA: Well, now you…
    Supervisor (cutting TSA off): If that’s how you want to see it, sir. Do you plan to make it to Tampa tonight or not?

    And so I gave up the bottles in order to get to my brother’s place, a trip that ended up taking some 26 hours all told. I’d forgotten about the 33cl can of Coke and the 20cl can of Malvern (sparkling water) in my jacket pocket. The jacket went through the X-ray machine. I noticed the cans when I put the jacket back on. TSA didn’t. Good thing, too, since everything closes at 8:00p.m. and it was 8:03.

    This is not about security. It’s about controlling people. Nothing more. The airlines won’t do anything about it on behalf of their passengers because they earn more money selling drinks to pax and can simply wash their hands of the matter and blame airport security. The security itself is, as this entry explains, a bloody joke. Few are laughing.


  4. peter P.

    May 13, 2007

    Look up ‘interdicting’.
    You really meant ‘intercepting’ ?


  5. Kristi

    Jul 17, 2007

    John,
    Who cares if you have to be where ever the lighter is to start a fire…….you obviously don’t understand terrorism.


  6. ReallyEvilCanine

    Jul 17, 2007

    Kirsti, you have all the logical skills of a seedless grape. You are allowed to carry matches on a plane but not a lighter. This is stupidity. You can set up a book of matches to function as a time-delay incendiary and be away from the actual fire. This is impossible with a lighter.

    Instead of being one of the millions of Chicken Littles running around screaming that the sky is falling, read this.

  7. Jul 19, 2007


  8. Nicole

    Sep 14, 2007

    ReallyEvilCanine, I am hoping that Kristi was being sarcastic. That’s how I read it and oh please, oh please let it be so.


Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2012 Homeland Stupidity.

Bad Behavior has blocked 3291 access attempts in the last 7 days.