<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Astroglide denies responsibility for customer information slip</title> <atom:link href="http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/04/25/astroglide-denies-responsibility-for-customer-information-slip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/04/25/astroglide-denies-responsibility-for-customer-information-slip/</link> <description>Protect yourself from government gaffes, bureaucratic blunders and incumbent incompetence</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:24:47 -0400</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Non entrare: Un aspetto dell&#8217;ottimizzazione dei siti per i motori di ricerca spesso trascurato &#124; Antezeta Web Marketing</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/04/25/astroglide-denies-responsibility-for-customer-information-slip/#comment-42720</link> <dc:creator>Non entrare: Un aspetto dell&#8217;ottimizzazione dei siti per i motori di ricerca spesso trascurato &#124; Antezeta Web Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 19:21:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/04/25/astroglide-denies-responsibility-for-customer-information-slip/#comment-42720</guid> <description>[...] Sfortunatamente, sembra che la gente dietro il lubrificante personale astroglide non hanno capito le implicazioni di lasciare dati sensibili dei clienti su un server web pubblico. Essi, e i loro clienti, hanno scoperto come i motori di ricerca possano essere finchÃ© troppo efficaci nella scoperta di contenuti â€“ basta che si trovi in un&#8217;area pubblica e c&#8217;Ã¨ un link pubblico a esso! Peccato astroglide ha dato la colpa a Google invece di ammettere la loro responsabilitÃ . [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sfortunatamente, sembra che la gente dietro il lubrificante personale astroglide non hanno capito le implicazioni di lasciare dati sensibili dei clienti su un server web pubblico. Essi, e i loro clienti, hanno scoperto come i motori di ricerca possano essere finchÃ© troppo efficaci nella scoperta di contenuti â€“ basta che si trovi in un&#8217;area pubblica e c&#8217;Ã¨ un link pubblico a esso! Peccato astroglide ha dato la colpa a Google invece di ammettere la loro responsabilitÃ . [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keep out: an often overlooked part of Search Engine Optimization &#124; Antezeta Web Marketing</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/04/25/astroglide-denies-responsibility-for-customer-information-slip/#comment-42676</link> <dc:creator>Keep out: an often overlooked part of Search Engine Optimization &#124; Antezeta Web Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 10:27:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/04/25/astroglide-denies-responsibility-for-customer-information-slip/#comment-42676</guid> <description>[...] Unfortunately, it appears that the folks behind the personal lubricant astroglide didn&#8217;t understand the implications of leaving sensitive customer data on a public web server. They, and their customers, found out how search engines can be all too effective in finding content - as long as it is in a public area and there is a public link to it! Too bad astroglide blamed Google rather than admitting the error of their ways. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unfortunately, it appears that the folks behind the personal lubricant astroglide didn&#8217;t understand the implications of leaving sensitive customer data on a public web server. They, and their customers, found out how search engines can be all too effective in finding content &#8211; as long as it is in a public area and there is a public link to it! Too bad astroglide blamed Google rather than admitting the error of their ways. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chronicles of Dissent</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/04/25/astroglide-denies-responsibility-for-customer-information-slip/#comment-41869</link> <dc:creator>Chronicles of Dissent</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:09:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/04/25/astroglide-denies-responsibility-for-customer-information-slip/#comment-41869</guid> <description>[...] More than 250,000 people&#8217;s names and addresses were exposed in the Astroglide breach. According to Threat Level, the files indexed by Google contain a total of 263,822 listings, each of which included a name and mailing addresses. Michael Hampton also has more on follow-up and on BioFilm&#8217;s response, which was to essentially blame Google. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More than 250,000 people&#8217;s names and addresses were exposed in the Astroglide breach. According to Threat Level, the files indexed by Google contain a total of 263,822 listings, each of which included a name and mailing addresses. Michael Hampton also has more on follow-up and on BioFilm&#8217;s response, which was to essentially blame Google. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BelchSpeak</title><link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/04/25/astroglide-denies-responsibility-for-customer-information-slip/#comment-41777</link> <dc:creator>BelchSpeak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:46:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/04/25/astroglide-denies-responsibility-for-customer-information-slip/#comment-41777</guid> <description>People that refuse to spend the necessary money to get security get themselves p0wn3d.  Biofilm is a small company, and luckily their exposure was limited to a few names and addresses.But TJ Maxx was a large corporation.  They too spent far too little in the way of network defense and monitoring and that breach they suffered and the danger of identity theft of their customers is big and very real.  The TJMaxx breach may be the largest single hack attack in corporate American History.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People that refuse to spend the necessary money to get security get themselves p0wn3d.  Biofilm is a small company, and luckily their exposure was limited to a few names and addresses.</p><p>But TJ Maxx was a large corporation.  They too spent far too little in the way of network defense and monitoring and that breach they suffered and the danger of identity theft of their customers is big and very real.  The TJMaxx breach may be the largest single hack attack in corporate American History.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/19 queries in 0.016 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.homelandstupidity.us

Served from: www.homelandstupidity.us @ 2010-03-17 17:41:54 -->