The Federal Emergency Management Agency wasted billions of dollars by awarding contracts for services to maintain and remove emergency trailers for people displaced by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita to politically well-connected and financially risky companies, according to an inspector general’s report released Monday.
But FEMA defended its actions, saying the contracts were awarded fairly.
The report, (PDF) requested by Sen. Byron L. Dorgan (D-N.D.) and Sen. Mary L. Landrieu (D-La.) found that FEMA awarded contracts to companies without determining whether the companies would be able to complete the work and accepted unrealistically low prices which then later ballooned to almost ten times the original ceiling.
In addition, several of the contract bidders posed “significant financial risk, including bidders with weak financial statements, incomplete and missing financial documentation, and negative net worth,” the report said. “FEMA allowed these contracts to go forward, in part because FEMA officials believed that the contract’s low minimum purchase requirement of $50,000 protected FEMA from contractor default or poor performance.”
Remember, these contracts were for companies to maintain, inspect and remove the trailers.
FEMA awarded no-bid contacts to four industry giants to install, maintain and then deactivate the units. The contracts originally had a ceiling of $400 million, but they quickly ballooned to roughly $3.4 billion. FEMA eventually re-competed a subset of the contracts with the awards going to six companies, including the original four.
Meanwhile, thousands of the trailers have never been used and sit idle at more than a dozen storage depots across the country. Among the waste was a $900 million purchase of 26,300 mobile and modular homes that FEMA later discovered could not be used in flood zones, where nearly all Katrina victims lived. — Government Executive
The 2005 storms, extensively covered here, submerged three-fourths of the city of New Orleans and displaced over 700,000 people. FEMA ordered 145,000 trailers for long-term housing, though thousands of them went unused and were left to rot.
In a report that will be made public later this week, the inspector general found that FEMA gave many of the contracts to politically connected firms -including Shaw Inc. of Baton Rouge. Shaw hired former FEMA Director Joe Allbaugh, one of President Bush’s friends, as its lobbyist. . . .
“(The inspector general’s report) suggests that taxpayers were victims and hurricane victims were victimized twice – once by Katrina and once by FEMA,” Dorgan said.
Second District U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson, the Democratic chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, is investigating all aspects of contracts awarded by FEMA for procurement, maintenance and deactivation of hurricane trailers. — Jackson Clarion-Ledger
(The report was published late Monday after theClarion-Ledger went to press.)
FEMA’s trailer procurement is a whole other can of sardines. It bought far too many, the trailers made people sick, and potentially opened residents up to burglary.
Oh well, a few billion here, a few billion there, who cares if the government wastes money. After all, the taxpayers will always give up more.
Jerry A. Pipes
Apr 25, 2007
Unfortunately, FEMA will never learn that this money is not theirs to give.
geri
Apr 25, 2007
I read that report as well. Another thing that stuck out in my mind was that FEMA issued contracts mainly to companies out of state instead of giving them to companies in state who, after Katrina, could not only have used the income but would probably have done it for less amount simply for the fact that they resided inside of the state. Not to mention that ties with the hurricane victims and knowledge of the area would probably have helped in choosing the trailers that were needed.
Unfortunately the old addage ‘It’s not what you know but who you know’ stands unchallenged in our governement.
Ray
Apr 25, 2007
I think that someone should note that there was nothing mechanical or other wise technically involved which says that the trailers could not be installed in the locations needed. it was a regulational issue. I think the solution would have been to come up with an evacuation plan which allowed people to each take two bags. Then have them sign that they understand this, and that anything they put in the trailer was at risk.
This done we should have installed the trailers in the needed locations and hoped for the best. Even at the worst it would have been better than what we ended up with. Sure we might have had to evacuate them again. But at least something would have happened.
On the other hand I have yet to figure out why we are working to rebuild New Orleans. It is soon (in a few decades) to become “ocean front property”. Ocean front property which is below sea level has another name — “sea floor.” We should be moving these functions somewhere else while we still have the time. Heck if we love the French Quarter so much for the money we are putting into New Orleans we could move it to the North past the point where everything is below sea level.
Michael Hampton
Apr 25, 2007
Getting government contracts absolutely is about who you know; I’ve written about it here before. It’s the standard way of doing business, in fact.