Is that homeless guy a terrorist?

May 2, 2007 @ Michael Hampton6 Comments

It’s said in the Bible that the poor will always be among us. In Springfield, Ill., as in most cities across the U.S., the homeless are at the public library. They use the restroom in the stairwell of the parking garage on top of which the library sits and they store their meager tarp-covered possessions next to the building. And mayor Tim Davlin is apparently at his wit’s end trying to deal with the homeless problem.

But a local alderman has come up with a novel idea to clean up downtown Springfield: Suggest a terrorist threat from homeless people.

The local homeless stack their possessions next to the library building. Alderman Frank Edwards called the possessions a “security risk” and suggested they could be stored elsewhere in town.

But the city’s homeland security officer doesn’t consider it a serious threat.

“It’s getting worse and worse,” Edwards said. “It’s nothing against the homeless. Name me one other city in the United States where you can stack up boxes wrapped in tarp next to a public building. . . . It’s just unsafe. You don’t know who’s putting those packages there.

“They made a big issue out of homeland security, and it’s a joke.”

Homeland security director Ralph Caldwell, who is also assistant police chief, said he could see why Edwards is worried. Caldwell said he has similar concerns but added, “It doesn’t look like there’s a homeland security threat.” — Springfield State Journal-Register

Police looked over the possessions Monday but didn’t see anything out of the ordinary, Caldwell said.

The local homeless community posts its own guard at the library to watch over the possessions. It’s certainly not a conventional solution, but I rate it unlikely that a terrorist would hide a bomb among the possessions of the homeless stacked up outside the library, especially with someone watching the whole time.

And while Springfield’s homeless problem certainly needs solutions, painting a terrorist threat where none is likely or even plausible isn’t going to solve the homeless problem. But it might get some of that federal homeland security money diverted into places it was never meant to go, like a more secure storage facility for the homeless to store what little they have.

(Aside from the mentally ill, the main cause of homelessness is social programs which hand out money and benefits like candy. These don’t help the homeless become productive members of society; they disempower their supposed beneficiaries by encouraging laziness and dependence. See San Francisco for the most obvious example of this. There are no easy solutions, because everyone’s situation is unique, but getting rid of government programs which encourage the homeless to stay homeless would be a good start.)

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

6 Comments → “Is that homeless guy a terrorist?”


  1. Matthew

    May 02, 2007

    You should read Kurt Vonnegut. He makes the point for helping people better than I ever could.

    Reply

  2. Ray

    May 02, 2007

    Well I would fell differently if I believed that the guy actually believed that they were a terrorist threat. Come on a library ?????? Now if you had the homeless living next to the foundation of a building that terrorists might actually like attack it would be different. But we all know that the alderman knows that terrorists will chose a more effective target like city hall.

    Reply

  3. BelchSpeak

    May 02, 2007

    Why is it that homeless people always pile up at cities where there are big liberal democrats in control?

    Rudy Giuliani actually took on the homeless issue and helped NYC turn around- he found that many homeless were mentally ill and needed hospitalization. Another large chunk were actually criminals that had outstanding warrants. Those went to jail where they belonged. The remainder were given job assistance and training to help them get back on their feet. It was a big job, but it got done, and for some reason Rudy was demonized for it.

    Reply

  4. Verbos

    May 02, 2007

    If you don’t have a physical address you can not get government assistance. Probably why Giuliani caught flack. The homeless are supported by charities some of which get some government funding. “Give a man a fish and you feed him a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him a lifetime.”

    Reply
  5. May 04, 2007

    Reply

  6. geri

    May 16, 2007

    Actually you don’t have to have a permanent address anymore thanks to the cards they hand out for food stamps instead of the paper they used to.
    Cash benefits can also go on this card as well and be extracted from an atm machine.
    I don’t know about completely taking away benefits though. I’m a single mom, I was homeless and thank goodness I found a program to help me train to get a good job. Now I am working and supporting my family…but barely. The food stamps help (I dont recieve cash benefits) to stretch my budget and feed my children while I work to keep a roof over their heads and clothes on their back.
    I think what is wrong is all the people who use the system instead of allowing it to help them while they work to become independant. It’s hurting those of us who are trying to get on our feet and giving all of those who have to rely on some type of government assistance a bad name.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2010 Homeland Stupidity.