Starting to see the nasty part of life yet?

And that is my opinion.

(For entertainment and educational purposes only. All rights reserved.)

Downes v Bidwell, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downes_v._Bidwell

Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, http://www.ark-of-salvation.org/hooven_downes.htm

TITLE 28 > PART VI > CHAPTER 176 > SUBCHAPTER A > § 3002. Definitions
(14) “State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/usc_sec_28_00003002—-000-.html

I believe I have cause to be deeply alarmed with regards to the hollowness of “my Rights”. So I investigated further and I find that the Supreme Court has placed, and is placing, most of it’s judgments on the Roscoe Conkling (admitted fraud http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roscoe_Conkling of placing the word “Person” rather than “People” in the 14th Amendment. Hell, take a look at Roe v Wade and all they do is talk about the person. We all know that the framers of the Constitution talked about their “posterity” and that would prove the death nail to the abortion rights movement…

This is a corporate UNITED STATES operating under the Color of Law. They should all arrest themselves, but not all of them are aware of the fraud and will most likely be notified once they themselves become leveraged by the “do you want your pension? Ok then, FIRE or go join them civies on the line…!”

Were not too far off from this as it is. Has anyone of you DHS folks asked the question of “why did Obama give the UN Police and Interpol Police greater jurisdictional authority than we have?” (EO 12425)

These tax protesters are correct, the IRS to my knowledge is a Federal Fraud. How we can tell is that about 25 million American’s are outside the jurisdiction of the Federal corporation known as “sovereigns”, a status King George in the Treaty of Paris gave to “the People!” The Federal (monopolist ever since Lincoln killed the organic Constitution) Corporation of DC through the above supreme court of equity/executive UCC court, not the Law of the Land common Law Supreme Court, has handed up all the Fed. Gov has ever wanted and they can do so because they are basing everything on their jurisdictional control of you via your signature card at the bank (read it next time), your SSI card, License and many other areas that through the color of law, though fully defrauding us all, they act with impunity though that in and of itself is placing us under Duress and also against the “law”…

Hey, you guys laid off the Nations business leaders. What else am I going to do but figure out what happened, you killed the dollar, my industry and you think I’m going to beg you all to have failures like the CIA become my master?

What this corporate country needs everyone doing is setting up bullet manufacturing facilities in every warehouse in the States that are reclaiming their sovereignty…

And that is my opinion.

(For entertainment and educational purposes only. All rights reserved.)

a “law of Congress” is only in the District, territories and possessions. This is not a “Law of the United States.” This is another subject and will not addressed in this post as I don’t have the time to even present a thumbnail sketch for list members to understand

Google Robert Clarkson or go to the Patriot Network

Call Robert Clarkson 864-255-3061 Beat the I.R.S.

26 U.S. Code 6065 VERIFICATION OF RETURNS.
Except as otherwise provided by the Secretary, any return, declaration, statement, or other document required to be made under any provision of the internal revenue laws or regulations shall contain or be verified by a written declaration that it is made under penalties of perjury.

Of course, the point then becomes, if they are not authorized to create a 1040 SFR they do not have to sign it according to 6065 because it is a document NOT REQUIRED TO BE MADE.

IF they cannot make a SFR for a 1040, does this not also suggest we are the ONLY ones with first hand knowledge of our status and thus are the ONLY ones who can testify, by way of a 1040/4852, concerning that status?

Therefore, if the company issues a W2 stating one thing and we rebut that “information” with a 4852, does not the company issuing the W2 have the obligation to prove its information to be correct and accurate? The IRS is a third party beneficiary and “should” not be a party to whether the W2 as issued is correct and accurate due to conflict of interest. Would they not side with the party claiming that which would benefit the IRS?

The following might be helpful in your situation as culled from the LostHorizons forum:

t is a common practice for the IRS to generate SFR’s to get people to fill out and sign a 1040 so as to not have a lien recorded at the local register of deeds (Wisconsin). I have a 82 year old buddy who has not filed in 13 years who in 2004 received two such SFR’s for 1998 ($30,000+) and 1999 ($15,000+) tax years saying he owed $45K+. In U.S. Tax Court, the judge denied the IRS attorney’s motion for summary judgement with the IRS’s SFR’s attached as evidence. You can peruse the following for helpful info.

I typed up the following for the fellow that received the above items who used it in tax court, where the judge denied IRS summary judgement:

When you use no brain cells & it works , keep doing it!

Several years ago at Freedom Law School , Peymon advised Dr Clarkson that Congress required the IRS, in Tax Court, to produce authentic evidence of wages and salaries. The tax return of the sheeple satisfies this requirement.

The non-filers produced no evidence that can be used against them in Tax Court or various state equivalents. Most state laws require that their DOR produce wage affidavits or income statements from the employer or payor, such as the W-2 or 1099 forms.

Frequently, the IRS cannot locate these mandatory documents unless the foolish taxpayer provides them attached to his 1040 form or the intended tax victim produces them to the tax court pursuant to discovery. The non-filers who destroy this essential documentation before their tax court filing cannot be required to produce records they do not have.

Most states’ DOR receive their payor information on a printout from the IRS. However, these state’s tax procedure codes requires DOR to file a certificate of wages or authenticated wage document with the seal/ribbon from the IRS . This is especially true in administrative courts.

Unfortunately, the state revenue departments and in many cases the federal revenue agency must in ALL court cases produce documents that simply do not exist. In other words if you do not produce the essential documents, they cannot and thus do not have a case.

Last month Patriot Michael from Spartanburg had a telephone hearing in the Carolina Patriots’ Greenville office, against the SC DOR before a SC Administrative Law Judge, which is our version of Tax Court. Dr. Clarkson and many great patriots surrounded the speaker phone to assist Michael. However this patriot was well prepared and handled the hearing very well by himself.

The highly paid chief council of the SC tax agency had filed many motions against Michael, including two motions to compel discovery. When the Administrative Law Judge came on the line, the tax liar dropped all of his harassment motions and concentrated on the lies against this fine patriot and on his responses to discovery.

The ALJ ruled against the tax collectors on the first motion. Then DOR Counsel verbally changed the second motion to what he meant to say. The tax villains lost both motions.

Last week, the tax court in Atlanta ruled against District Counsel due to her failure to produce any wage statements. Atlanta patriot Richard Clark stood his ground and did not back down to the assaults and slander against him. He represented himself with Dr. Clarkson sitting at the table with him. Richard had taken the time to prepare and do his homework. Dr. Clarkson was only needed for moral support.

The tax court judge ruled that the IRS agent MUST produce wage affidavits or her case would be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The IRS had discovered that one employer no longer existed, another was too small to expend the resources to collect the information and the third one told the IRS to scram! Therefore the IRS had no, none, nada, nothing in the way of evidence against our brave patriot. We missed a total, smashing, recorded victory because Dr. Clarkson was overwhelmed with other cases and unable to prepare responses to discovery on time. Therefore, Richard filed his mandatory pleadings as the Judge noted, “belated. “

The tax court judge said Richard had not obeyed the rules because Richard (Dr. Clarkson) did not know what they were. That is not true. We know what the rules are; we just did not have the resources to fully comply. However the PN is taking on new staff members to handle the midribs of tax appeal.
SMASHING VICTORY—THE WIPE OUT!!

This week SC DOR in the case of long time freedom fighter LT, admitted officially and under oath they had no wage documentation, no official payor statements and no authentic evidence against this courageous freedom fighter.

All courts require that both sides produce in all trials, evidence which is authenticated and legal. IRS printouts just do not count. This admission came in response to LT’s request for admissions found on our website under Audit Procedure.

Since the DOR does not have the documentation required by law they must stop harassing LT and all other patriots in SC. Then the PN staff will make all the State tax collectors stop harassing patriots and non-filers.

When Dr. Clarkson read the Admissions from SC DOR, the good Doctor was in shock and used some exuberant language. In effect, the lawyers for the tax collectors told the truth and made an admission that wipes out the state’s harassment of non-filers.

Clarkson was quoted in a recent press announcement that “The SC DOR will have to make arrangements with us just as their predecessor, the SC Tax Commission did. Patriots demand that the state tax thieves leave us alone. Twenty-five years ago they agreed to that informal deal.”

Not one loss. The procedural method works !!!

Cases Clarkson has won!

Patriot Paralegal Sherri B. of Florida recently won a bank summons case on appeal to Federal Court of Appeals in Atlanta. She already won two remands in this same case before the 11th Circuit Court on paperwork errors of the District Court, without a decision.

Dr Robert Clarkson helped Sherri through this long and difficult case. Her appellant brief and a copy of the Appeals decision can be viewed from our Members Only section of this website. She and Clarkson wrote a magnificent appeals brief.

This is the second 11th Circuit Court decision for the PN this year. Another victory is expected any day on an illegal Federal Tax Lien.

Peymon at Freedom Law School recently won a 7609 case and is now suing for damages. Dan Lying, paralegal at FLS, was on the brief. Dan won his 7609 case years ago.
Click here to view other cases we have won .

The poverty option brings about the same result because the GNP drops through the floor.
Boy, these guys are something Peter K.. You’ve been having a battle of wits with unarmed men.

10. Where the Employment Tax Coordinator and/or District Counsel are unable to persuade an employer to comply with our withholding instructions, Examination should consider initiating an employment tax examination. In very serious situations, Examination will seek advice from District Counsel as to an appropriate course of action (e.g. seek an injunction against the employer).

Thousands of employers are obeying The Congress and the Courts, i.e. honoring the worker’s payroll status and not once has the IRS sought court action. On the other hand employees have filed suit and collected damages against employers.

In conclusion the above excerpted memorandum, easily available in its entirety from the IRS, your Congressman or from the person who sent you this notice, shows only part of the disgraceful conduct of an administrative agency running wild. The employers best course is to abide by the letter of the law.

The dispute over withholding is a matter between the citizens and the tax collector, the company should remain neutral.

IRS THREATS: ALL BLUFF

According to an official Internal Revenue Service Memorandum, agents are directed to make threats and no more to employers who honor their employees W-4 forms according to law, i.e. 26 U.S. Code 3402 (n).

In fact, low-level agents are directed by their superiors to make false representation or lie – but again, do no more, according to paragraph 9 (partially reprinted below) of National Office Memorandum dated 30 Dec 80

Across the country, thousands of employees are lawfully filing exempt or claiming extra allowances on the W-4 withholding certificate, thereby depriving the Treasury Department of both interest-free use of money not owed and effective control of a portion of a citizens freedom.

The bureaucracy naturally is fighting this tax loophole for working men and women but are hampered by both an Act of Congress [IRS 3402 (n)] that requires employers to honor the W-4 form as filed and decision in the Federal Courts US vs. Malinkowski 347 F Supp 352 (1972) which ruled: “The employer is not authorized to alter the form or to dishonor the employee’s claim.” (emphasis added)

The deceitful and unethical instructions of top level IRS officials to the field staff are spelled out in detail in the 30 Dec 80 Memorandum which is available to you from the agent who contacted you or from the Disclosure Office in your District Director’s office under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 USC 552. Excerpts include:

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE MEMORANDUM DATED ~30 DEC 1980

TO: All District Directors and Service Center Directors All Assistant Regional Commissioners (Tm and Examination) (Information Copy to All Regional Commissioners, Regional Counsels)

FROM: Director, Examination Division CP:E Director, Taxpayer Service Division Tx:T