<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TSA among most unpopular federal agencies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/</link>
	<description>Protect yourself from government gaffes, bureaucratic blunders and incumbent incompetence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17456</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17456</guid>
		<description>Hate them now? just wait until you see their &quot;October surprise&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate them now? just wait until you see their &#8220;October surprise&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guy</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17455</link>
		<dc:creator>guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17455</guid>
		<description>i refer to those bashing tsa for no good reason, not the original poster of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i refer to those bashing tsa for no good reason, not the original poster of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guy</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17454</link>
		<dc:creator>guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17454</guid>
		<description>what an idiot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what an idiot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shelia</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17453</link>
		<dc:creator>shelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 18:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17453</guid>
		<description>doe TSA disqualify you for speeding tickets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doe TSA disqualify you for speeding tickets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPC</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17452</link>
		<dc:creator>JPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17452</guid>
		<description>Just got the call today to star orientation on May 10t-15th for san diego, then they said i will be going up to LA on May 17th-22nd for more training before i start OJT on May 24th, i just hope that they will be willing to work with me on my school schedule for college</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got the call today to star orientation on May 10t-15th for san diego, then they said i will be going up to LA on May 17th-22nd for more training before i start OJT on May 24th, i just hope that they will be willing to work with me on my school schedule for college</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17451</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17451</guid>
		<description>One does have to wonder about the breasts, and the pants.   Frankly given the nature and size of artificial limbs I would think that some additional precautions are in order.  But I would think that those precautions should be set.

In your case I certainly do see every reason to look at the leg.  Frankly a leg could contain a lot of material that goes bang.   So a visual inspection and swipe it with the explosives detection cloth would certainly be in order. Also, any time one is checking any part of a person and their things for explosives one would assume that checking the hands would be a good additional process.   The rest of this sounds less necessary.    But at least it sounds like they provided a same sex person to do this.   The attitude I experience seems to be that I am a guy, and if I am normal getting felt up by a woman should not bother me.

I do have to wonder who after they find out you have an artificial leg, they have you go through all of the other intermediary steps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One does have to wonder about the breasts, and the pants.   Frankly given the nature and size of artificial limbs I would think that some additional precautions are in order.  But I would think that those precautions should be set.</p>
<p>In your case I certainly do see every reason to look at the leg.  Frankly a leg could contain a lot of material that goes bang.   So a visual inspection and swipe it with the explosives detection cloth would certainly be in order. Also, any time one is checking any part of a person and their things for explosives one would assume that checking the hands would be a good additional process.   The rest of this sounds less necessary.    But at least it sounds like they provided a same sex person to do this.   The attitude I experience seems to be that I am a guy, and if I am normal getting felt up by a woman should not bother me.</p>
<p>I do have to wonder who after they find out you have an artificial leg, they have you go through all of the other intermediary steps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17450</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17450</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how I got stuck on this side of the argument.  All I&#039;m trying to do is get people to appreciate that there is in fact a threat to the safety of air traffic.  I don&#039;t think there is anything that can be done to make it completely safe but the government( because they get blamed for everything when it does happen), is trying to make it a little safer by beefing up security.  I&#039;ve mentioned before, that it obviously must be having some effect, simply because there hasn&#039;t been a plane blown out of the sky since 9/11.  Who knows how long that will last.

However, to make security tighter, they hired a lot of average people complete with all their emotional baggage and gave them the power to control people like sheep.  Equal employment at work.  Can&#039;t say no to somebody who wants a government job or you might get sued.  I&#039;m sure there are good people there too but if they reflect normal society, they are probably vastly outnumbered.

All I ask is that you consider their position before you criticize them too harshly.  They see all the training videos and are probably scared stupid about all the stuff that could get by them.  They know that it will be their fault if it does.  They run you through the metal detector twenty times because they just want the problem to go away.  When it doesn&#039;t, they are mad because you are making their job harder so they punish you for it.  That&#039;s just what stupid people do.  As long as you can say that you wouldn&#039;t do the same thing if you had their responsibility, then my work here is done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how I got stuck on this side of the argument.  All I&#8217;m trying to do is get people to appreciate that there is in fact a threat to the safety of air traffic.  I don&#8217;t think there is anything that can be done to make it completely safe but the government( because they get blamed for everything when it does happen), is trying to make it a little safer by beefing up security.  I&#8217;ve mentioned before, that it obviously must be having some effect, simply because there hasn&#8217;t been a plane blown out of the sky since 9/11.  Who knows how long that will last.</p>
<p>However, to make security tighter, they hired a lot of average people complete with all their emotional baggage and gave them the power to control people like sheep.  Equal employment at work.  Can&#8217;t say no to somebody who wants a government job or you might get sued.  I&#8217;m sure there are good people there too but if they reflect normal society, they are probably vastly outnumbered.</p>
<p>All I ask is that you consider their position before you criticize them too harshly.  They see all the training videos and are probably scared stupid about all the stuff that could get by them.  They know that it will be their fault if it does.  They run you through the metal detector twenty times because they just want the problem to go away.  When it doesn&#8217;t, they are mad because you are making their job harder so they punish you for it.  That&#8217;s just what stupid people do.  As long as you can say that you wouldn&#8217;t do the same thing if you had their responsibility, then my work here is done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonofapeach</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17449</link>
		<dc:creator>sonofapeach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17449</guid>
		<description>I agree.  Why all the other invasive stuff when it&#039;s a simple medical appliance?  They know where the metal is as soon as you go through the detector.  Why are my breasts being touched?  The waist of my pants turned down?  My palms swiped for chemicals?  It&#039;s overkill.  A simple question on the part of the screener &amp; a pat down the leg should be sufficient to confirm that it is in fact a prosthetic leg, not the &quot;mad leg-bomber&quot; wired up like one of Bob&#039;s poor Down&#039;s Syndrome ladies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Why all the other invasive stuff when it&#8217;s a simple medical appliance?  They know where the metal is as soon as you go through the detector.  Why are my breasts being touched?  The waist of my pants turned down?  My palms swiped for chemicals?  It&#8217;s overkill.  A simple question on the part of the screener &amp; a pat down the leg should be sufficient to confirm that it is in fact a prosthetic leg, not the &#8220;mad leg-bomber&#8221; wired up like one of Bob&#8217;s poor Down&#8217;s Syndrome ladies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17448</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17448</guid>
		<description>Actually my experience and my training in security (another area but I think the same thing applies) says just the inverse.

If you stress everyone and create an environment where security is the enemy of all that they are dealing with, then it is hard to tell those who are stressed by the contact with security, and those who are stressed by trying to get something by security.   While if security is more friendly then those who are stressed for reasons that security needs to look at will stand out more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually my experience and my training in security (another area but I think the same thing applies) says just the inverse.</p>
<p>If you stress everyone and create an environment where security is the enemy of all that they are dealing with, then it is hard to tell those who are stressed by the contact with security, and those who are stressed by trying to get something by security.   While if security is more friendly then those who are stressed for reasons that security needs to look at will stand out more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17447</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2008/01/02/tsa-among-most-unpopular-federal-agencies/#comment-17447</guid>
		<description>Hey, like I said, some of them are probably just not nice or smart human beings.  I&#039;m not going to defend that.

I don&#039;t know what their training is either but it is possible that they intentionally keep the stress levels a little higher just to freak out someone who is doing something wrong.  Make them easier to spot.

Wouldn&#039;t it be nice if we all got the Royal treatment, but congressmen get treated like congressmen and a guy with a piece of steel in his arm gets treated like a guy with a piece of steel in his arm.  The masses never get respect from authority but lately we all seem to think we deserve it.  That&#039;s why I say we&#039;re acting kind of spoiled.

Once in a while you will see a commoner get respect.  Some people just have an air about them and they are usually always right when they demand service.  Ask names and write them down, that always puts fear in the heart of a public servant.
I don&#039;t know what to say Ray, the world isn&#039;t nice to everybody.  Never was and never will be.  Sometimes you get treated like a piece of crap.  You either refuse to tolerate it on the spot or you have to let it go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, like I said, some of them are probably just not nice or smart human beings.  I&#8217;m not going to defend that.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what their training is either but it is possible that they intentionally keep the stress levels a little higher just to freak out someone who is doing something wrong.  Make them easier to spot.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be nice if we all got the Royal treatment, but congressmen get treated like congressmen and a guy with a piece of steel in his arm gets treated like a guy with a piece of steel in his arm.  The masses never get respect from authority but lately we all seem to think we deserve it.  That&#8217;s why I say we&#8217;re acting kind of spoiled.</p>
<p>Once in a while you will see a commoner get respect.  Some people just have an air about them and they are usually always right when they demand service.  Ask names and write them down, that always puts fear in the heart of a public servant.<br />
I don&#8217;t know what to say Ray, the world isn&#8217;t nice to everybody.  Never was and never will be.  Sometimes you get treated like a piece of crap.  You either refuse to tolerate it on the spot or you have to let it go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.074 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 14:02:39 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
