Hot damn. The government is going to stimulate the economy. Not with a lap dance or lubricated love glove, but with taxpayer dollars. Come summer, Mister and Miz America will get a rebate from Uncle Sam. What a man! Some people will get more than a thou of their own money back. Consumers will rush out and pump the economy. Wal-Mart here we come. Simultaneously, just like in romance novels.
Meanwhile, back at Rancho Notorious for Tax and Spend, pols will do it the usual way. On top, with the lights out.
Suddenly, next Summer…
Americans feel soiled and empty after trysting with Wal-Mart. Thanks to Helicopter Ben’s interest rate cuts/puts, the heat was fleeting. (Folks with saving accounts never defrosted.) “Is that all there is?” asks the collective Peggy Lee, “A couple of plastic lawn chairs and a bag of groceries?” Wal-Mart winks and promises more trash for more cash. While Starbucks says coffee is for closers.
Real estate! Will the stimulus pack bring sexy back? Rebates are the front load of the package; the spoonful of sugar that helps the medicine go down. The potential kicker, as agreed upon by President Bush and the House of Reps (the Senate still has to sign on) is the lifting of limits and loosening of standards governing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the GSE mortgage giants.
GSE equals government-sponsored enterprise. GSEs are private companies, but enjoy considerable support and advantages from the federal government. In return, they perform certain public chores and are regulated differently than non-GSE mortgage meisters. The largest GSEs are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Their original mission was to buy conforming (not subprime) mortgages from lenders, thereby enabling them to make more loans. Fan and Fred hold some mortgages and market others as mortgage-backed securities (MBS). The securities are GSE guaranteed. While Fan and Fred aren’t pure government poodles, investors assume taxpayers will clean up after any mess they make, or do a bailout should they fail. The bailout assumption is fed by unclear policy re the level of support the GSEs would receive in a major crisis. The chance of meltdown is said to be slim. Until recently, so was the chance of a national housing crash. And until well into 2007, many financial pundits said subprime damage was contained.
Together, Fannie and Freddie back more than $4 trillion in mortgages. The question has often arisen as to whether their capital cushion is too thin to support such massive debt. At times, it’s been difficult to measure their cushion, due to pervasive book juggling.
Before Wall Street screamed bloody murder at the opening of 2008, President Bush was resisting pressure to lift the financial limit on the mortgages Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac purchase and securitize. The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), the GSEs’ wimpy watchdog, also objected to lifting the limit and continues to do so post stimulus agreement. The present GSE limit is $417,000. The stimulus would snap the cap to $625,500, and to $729,750 in extra pricey housing markets. Allowing Fannie and Freddie to purchase and securitize jumbo mortgages, the oversize loans MBS investors now shun as too risky.
The jumbo shun makes lenders, Realtors, developers, and the pols who represent inflated housing markets, sad. The cap snap makes them happy. A GSE guarantee could stimulate investor interest in jumbo! Hopefully, jumbo won’t get too frisky and drop dead in the sack ala Nelson Rockefeller. Taxpayers would be flattened.
Speaking of being crushed, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are big buyers of mortgages cut by Countrywide Financial. They bought some 40% of Countrywide loans in 2006. The year mortgage lending went sub-cellar. Countrywide has been hit hard by lack of investor appetite for jumbo — and by its own unhinged underwriting. Of late, the mega lender has been denying bankruptcy rumors while selling itself to Bank of America. Bankruptcy talk caused Fan and Fred shares to tumble. That happens a lot these days. As do massive write downs. The GSEs took it on the chin in the 3rd quarter of 2007. Freddie had a record loss of $2 billion, Fannie lost $1.4 billion. The 4th quarter is expected to follow through.
As investors abandoned subprime MBS in 2007, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mounted a rescue mission. Fannie funded over $66 billion in subprime mortgage loans in the first half of 2007. But Patricia Parsons, director of product development, said Fannie “would continue to step lightly into this business.”* According to Becky Froass, senior director in industry and state relations at Freddie Mac, the company’s MBS portfolio held 15% subprime in 2006. Freddie hoped to buy $9 billion more in 2007.
Then there are the lawsuits and investigations. Just like the subprime and/or jumbo players who operated sans government mattress, Fannie and Freddie have acquired a saucy rep.
In January, the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System and state Attorney General Mark Dan filed a class action suit against Freddie Mac. The retirement fund lost $27.2 million in Freddie Mac MBS. Attorney General Dan alleges Freddie Mac hid the fact that the securities were backed by subprime. Saying the GSE “participated in one of the largest housing investment deceptions in modern U.S. economic times.”** In 2006, Freddie coughed up $410 million in a national class action suit headed by two Ohio pension funds. In that case, fudged financial statements were at issue. And OFHEO is seeking $215 million in damages from Fannie Mae, related to account manipulation at Fannie during the reign of former Chief Executive Officer Franklin Raines.
In November, 2007, the office of New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo issued subpoenas to Fannie and Freddie. Seeking, among other things, “Information about all of the mortgage loans Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have purchased from any bank, including Washington Mutual, and the mortgage backed securities associated with those loans.” According to Cuomo, Washington Mutual, aka WaMu, colluded with First American Corporation and subsidiary, eAppraiseIT (one of the nations largest appraisal management companies) to inflate appraisal values on homes WaMu mortgaged. If so, the value of the mortgage backed securities based on those appraisals would also be false. In 2007 alone, WaMu provided Freddie Mac with $24.7 billion in potential MBS. Fannie Mae bought $7.8 billion.
President Bush and his fellow economic stimulators say the GSE cap will only be raised temporarily. All the bad buzz re Fannie and Freddie could be as false as the alleged false appraisals buoying WaMu MBS. And buying, securitizing, and guaranteeing jumbo mortgages when housing values are slip-sliding may be a wise financial strategy. But come Summer, when the rebate part of the stimulus package arrives, taxpayers might want to sink their windfall into a bottle of generic hooch and party as if it were Fat Tuesday. Because the GSE jack in the back could mean one long stint in Lentville.
Carola Von Hoffmannstahl-Solomonoff
Mondo QT
*“Risky credit shunned by Wall Street,” Neil J. Morse,Inman News, 09/28/07
**“Ohio vs. Freddie Mac: Mortgage lender hid big risks, suit alleges,” James Nash,Columbus Dispatch, 01/23/08
“Fannie Risks Won’t Rise With Bigger Loans, Mudd Says,” Kathleen Hays and James Tyson,Bloomberg News, 01/29/08
“Fannie and Freddie to the Rescue?,” Dawn Kopecki,Business Week, 01/25/08
Statement of OFHEO Director James B. Lockhart on Conforming Loan Limit Increase,Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, 01/24/08
“Housing slump to continue: Fannie CEO,” Marcy Gordon,Associated Press, 01/08/08
“No Rescue Here: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are in no position to bail out the housing market,”Washington Post, 11/23/07
“On Wall Street: Subprime flames lick at Freddie,” Saskia Scholtes,Financial Times, 11/23/07
“New York Attorney General Cuomo Sends Letters of Notice and Demand to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae,” Press Release, 11/06/07
“Fannie Mae Ex-Officers Sued by U.S.,” Eric Dash,New York Times, 12/19/06
Send comments or confidential tips to:
Will it work????
Jan 30, 2008
It may work for a week but, the real problems is millions of jobs went out of the US for cheap labor. The real problem is too much being spent on the War and not enought jobs. If there were better paying jobs and more of them the economy would be doing much better. There have not been ,as many good jobs since the 1970s sources claim. Those were the days they claim. You could even buy a Cadillac for about $2,000.00. This could be true they claim.
Anonymous
Jan 30, 2008
Hello Homeland Stupidity, – Why aren’t The PEOPLE and Congress focusing on the Real Homeland Terrorist Threats?! – Weakening Our Economy and Vastly Increasing the National Debt,- IS the number One Terrorist Threat! Bush, Cheney, Paulson, Bernanke,- and the Private Corporation, the so-called Federal Reserve, – are the main problem and Cause of Decreasing Homeland Security!! Why are they not investigated, audited, and in jail?! We need to take America back. Globalist Bankers, and the Military-Industrial Complex are now in charge. And We The PEOPLE, blindly allow this to go on and on…… “Serious Change Is Needed Immediately”! – jward32
I second that!!!
Jan 30, 2008
I could not have said it better myself!!! Kick ASS America before it is too LATE!!!
Mike
Feb 02, 2008
I’ll probably end up getting $600.00, which is already spent on expenses. Big deal. Lower my income taxes to, say, 5%, and keep the $600.00.
Taxes SUCK
Feb 04, 2008
Any taxes SUCK!!!
Carola Von H.
Feb 04, 2008
Good points about the loss of good paying jobs (real estate juggling was supposed to plug the gap) and the homeland threat of national debt. And of course, the picayune rebate Mike will receive won’t include the interest he deserves for loaning his money to Uncle Sam. A 5% income tax rate sounds pretty good to me as well. Though I agree that all taxes suck, not having highways or any national defense sucks worse.
Radio Rick
Feb 04, 2008
Those over 65 account for 25% of the country’s wealth + will have had the highest standard of living “peak” ever yet AARP insists on getting up to the trough too. A real economic stimulus would be to allow those of us in the late boomer period along with the Gen X/Y-ers to have an ATM card against our Social In-security funds we’ve been paying in which we’ll never see. If FEMA can hand out $2K cards in NOLA to everyone then why is this pay out taking so long?
It doesn’t make much sense to have this stimulus $ to coincide with one’s tax refund check, stagger ‘em a bit for the biggest bang for the buck.
How about this??
Feb 04, 2008
A $100,000.00 tax refund check will make everything pick up allright!! We could party like a rock star and get the good goodies ha ha
The real problem
Feb 06, 2008
The Real problem is ever since the Great Depression people have lost trust in the nation and what they should do with thier money. What may be may not be tommorow. If we have more faith and spend with that faith the economy will do better. We see tons of people with huge savings accounts that do not even buy underwear. I know some say “The buck stops here but, that is ridiculous!!! We buy what we need but, spending to enjoy life is no Sin!! You can’t take it with you when you go and besides people need to live a little.
Faith
Feb 07, 2008
Have faith in America and buy what you need. IT is ok to splurge a little. It is good for you and it stimulates the economy. Besides “You are worth it Babe!!”.
Carola Von H.
Feb 07, 2008
How about– have faith in America and buy what you can afford.
Afford ????
Feb 08, 2008
A great deal of people can afford underwear, soap and an occasional bottle of wine. They are what stimulates the economy not Mr.Scrooge save it until you can put it in your coffin and live a boring depressing life!!! People should save some but, spend too. This is a free country not the Republic of China!!! We desserve to have fun and enjoy our lives. What good is life if you have a ton of money and are dead in a coffin???? You should stick to a budget yes but, if you have the money you should enjoy yourself too. Go out to eat, buy a Starbucks, buy some new shoes, see a movie and enjoy your life!!!! If you don’t who will enjoy your money your relative when you are dead or will Uncle Sam cease it and spend it in Iraq???
Money....
Feb 09, 2008
Money may be the root of all evil but, so is treating one’s self like crap to get a larger saving’s account!! Sure save some But, Stimulate the economy by loving that special person you are!! Treat yourself and buy what you need too!! The time is now going on forever. Do you want that book at Barnes and Noble?? Buy it!! Do you have worn out clothes and can afford new ones??? Buy and make America a better place. Plus you will feel better about yourself too. You are priceless and no one could ever replace you!! Don’t ever forget that and be good to yourself. No one else will. You have to do it yourself!! The greatest love of all is loving you so, go do it!!
Bob
Feb 12, 2008
Wow. I had no idea.
Bob
Feb 12, 2008
No idea that I was so special.
Free libertarian
Feb 15, 2008
I don’t need the government to stimulate my package…thank you.