Poor children more likely to be drugged

December 14, 2009 @ 4 Comments

Low-income children on Medicaid are given antipsychotic drugs at a rate four times higher than children covered by private insurance, and for less serious conditions, according to new research to be published early next year.

The research, conducted by a team at Rutgers University and Columbia University and to be published in the peer-reviewed journal Health Affairs, is already available online.

The question is, do children on government health care get drugged more often because they need it, or because it’s easier for the bureaucrats than counseling and therapy, which can be more expensive?

As it turns out, Medicaid pays much less for counseling and therapy than for drugs, and there are long waiting lists for psychiatrists who accept Medicaid, facts which encourage doctors treating a Medicaid patient to favor the prescription, even if it might not be strictly necessary.

“It’s easier for patients, and it’s easier for docs,” said Dr. Derek H. Suite, a psychiatrist in the Bronx whose pediatric cases include children and adolescents covered by Medicaid and who sometimes prescribes antipsychotics. “But the question is, ‘What are you prescribing it for?’ That’s where it gets a little fuzzy.”

Too often, Dr. Suite said, he sees young Medicaid patients to whom other doctors have given antipsychotics that the patients do not seem to need. Recently, for example, he met with a 15-year-old girl. She had stopped taking the antipsychotic medication that had been prescribed for her after a single examination, paid for by Medicaid, at a clinic where she received a diagnosis of bipolar disorder.

Why did she stop? Dr. Suite asked. “I can control my moods,” the girl said softly.

After evaluating her, Dr. Suite decided she was right. The girl had arguments with her mother and stepfather and some insomnia. But she was a good student and certainly not bipolar, in Dr. Suite’s opinion.

“Normal teenager,” Dr. Suite said, nodding. “No scrips for you.” — New York Times

The research data showed that 4 percent of children on Medicaid received antipsychotic drugs, compared to 1 percent of privately insured children. But the expected increase in need for the drugs among poor children due to their circumstances was only 2 to 1.

The drugs at issue were FDA approved for disorders such as schizophrenia, autism and bipolar disorder. But the study found that children on Medicaid were much more likely to receive them for less serious conditions such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or “persistent defiance.”

That’s right, a child with his own mind has to be drugged into submission. No social stability without individual stability.

Children on Medicaid are just the tip of the iceberg. Those in foster care are drugged at such high rates as to defy belief: half to two-thirds of foster children in Florida, Texas and Massachusetts are on antipsychotic drugs, thanks largely to discredited scientific theories still being used by the federal government.

Of course, the government generally needs to drug your children when the public school system fails to destroy their souls and turn them into automatons. O brave new world, that has such people in it!

["Sheep on Drugs" photo by Lefteris Heretakis; CC BY 2.0]

4 Comments → “Poor children more likely to be drugged”


  1. Margaret Wilde

    Dec 14, 2009

    This is shocking. The prescribing medics and the complicit foster parents should be ashamed to be party to such cruelty.

    I suspect that a major reason for the high prescribing of these harmful drugs to children is to swell the profits of the drug companies.

    I am confident that antipsychotic drugs should NEVER be prescribed to children and only very very rarely to adults if at all.

    BTW, if anyone reading this has taken prescription drugs and gained weight because of this, the safe, sure way to reduce the weight gain is to cut down on salt and salty food. This reduces the fluid retention which the drugs often cause.


  2. Bob

    Dec 15, 2009

    Rowdy kids used to get spanked and have their asses kicked. It was crude but seemed to work for thousands of years and it was cheap too. Every adult had a boot to swing and switches grew on trees.
    Then we had the sixties and learned that violence never solved anything. (Who said that anyway?)

    Now we don’t solve our problems with violence, we solve them with drugs.
    In the past, ass kickings used to be more common amongst the poor folks, so it stands to reason that poor kids get more drugs today.
    Same problem as before, it didn’t go away, we still think it’s just awful how we deal with it, but now big business is making money.

    The touchy feely, feel good baby boomer generation was the biggest tool of big business that ever walked the earth. They never even knew it. They thought they were all about stickin’ it to the man. Ha! “The man” has been laughing all the way to the bank for 50 years.


  3. Michael Hampton

    Dec 15, 2009

    I dunno. Maybe that generation was just seduced by power, like everyone else.

  4. Dec 30, 2011


Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2012 Homeland Stupidity.

Bad Behavior has blocked 2645 access attempts in the last 7 days.