National security whistleblower hearings

Yesterday the House Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations held hearings on whether national security whistleblowers have enough protection against retaliation and whether they have sufficient process to be able to report wrongdoing in their respective agencies. Some very interesting things came out of the hearings.

Russell Tice tried to report potential espionage in the Defense Intelligence Agency, and tried to find a way to report possibly illegal programs in the National Security Agency, and was declared paranoid, had his security clearance pulled, and was fired as the government’s way of saying thanks. Tice testified that he had further information to give to the Congress regarding other programs in NSA which may be illegal, but as it turns out, the intelligence committees which are supposed to oversee such programs don’t have the necessary security clearance (PDF) to hear about them; the armed services committees, however, do.

Members of the Subcommittee asked questions of each of the witnesses to determine how someone who finds wrongdoing would go about reporting it and what is likely to happen to them if they do. The witnesses described the retaliation which was taken against them, as well as the unresolved status of each of their respective allegations. The Subcommittee appeared concerned that whistleblowers don’t have adequate procedures to report wrongdoing and that their fear of retaliation may cause them to turn to the news media as a safer option instead.

As I was watching an Internet stream of the hearings, I missed much of it, and the audio kept cutting out on all the good parts, or I’d give you some nice quotes. If I can dig up a copy of video from the hearings, I’ll post an update.

Update: The Project On Government Oversight also points out that part of the problem is that inspectors general aren’t independent enough from the agencies they are supposed to oversee.

The Federation of American Scientists has placed online all of the prepared testimony from the hearings.

(Thanks to POGO.)

Update 2: Another good summary of the hearings from the New York Times.

One thought on “National security whistleblower hearings

  • June 12, 2006 at 10:34 am

    they dont wan’t the truth out. all the rights they are taking away from the people have no effect on or do they increase national security in the least.

    however, doing waht they did to this man has a negative effect on national security because what if he’s right? they didnt even investigate it, they never questioned timithy mc veigh about his ties to al quaida, they killed this other guy instead of capturing him so they could extract information from him, they imprisioned a man who was hunting bin laden, and they flew bin ladens family out of the states witout investigating any of them after the attacks– then they made up all this crap about iraq, when they are the ones who sold chemical weapons to sadam in the first place!

    it’s a big fat hoax, and the joke is on the american people, at the expense of the people they are claiming to be protecting. the only thing these liars are protecting is their bank accounts

Comments are closed.